
by Travis Mateer
I’m confused.
If Danit Ehrlich drowned, which is what we are being told almost definitely happened to her, then WHY is a Detective like Guy Baker getting in front of the camera? This alleged drowning is considered to be an accident, right? Then WHY have a Detective spend valuable time talking to the media about an ACCIDENT? Don’t you have some criminals to be catching, Guy Baker?

I’ll tell you why I think Baker is involved, and it’s pretty simple: narrative control.
Right now the family of Danit Ehrlich is being handled by the professionals into accepting the narrative of accidental drowning, a scenario that sounds like the likely scenario for what happened.
But what if Danit DIDN’T drown?
If something else happened, the most critical time to be effective, for the professionals, is the first 48 hours of a disappearance. That timeframe has already passed. Now we have Guy Baker, the Detective who STILL can’t find Jermain Charlo, telling us about the “best time” to find Danit’s body in the river.
Missoula Detective Guy Baker was also on scene and said there would be a large number of resources being used in the search efforts throughout the rest of Wednesday.
“This is the best time to find Danit, as the ice has receded,” Baker said. “But water levels will keep rising this week. We are expending a lot of resources today.”
Baker said in addition to search and rescue divers, submersible sonar, K-9 units and drones were being used. The Missoula Police Department, Missoula County Sheriff’s Office, Missoula County Search and Rescue, and Lewis and Clark County Search and Rescue were involved in the effort.
See all the professionals involved? And yet they haven’t found the body yet. At least the family seems satisfied with how they’ve been handled thus far (emphasis mine):
Members of Ehrlich’s family were present during search and rescue efforts on Wednesday. Bunny Ehrlich, Danit Ehrlich’s mother, thanked law enforcement officers Missoulians for their support during the search.
“The whole force, and including the people in Missoula, have been so kind to us,” Bunny Ehrlich said. “Everywhere we go they have heard of our daughter, Danit, and what’s happened, and they have been incredible to us. Just want people to know we are very thankful for the (City of Missoula.)”
I don’t doubt the point of emphasis in this quote because Missoula is filled with young women and their fur babies. On Reddit it’s clear that’s why some are so immediately invested, emotionally, in confirming what everything assumes happened to her.

This whole scenario reminds me A LOT of Rebekah Barsotti’s case, the young woman who ALSO, we are told, died in an accidental drowning related to her dog, Cerberus. While the body of the dog was found in just 10 days, Rebekah’s body wasn’t found until 10 MONTHS later, and questions persist TO THIS DAY about what really happened to her.
When Danit first when missing, I agreed with the assessment that accidental drowning appeared to be the likely scenario, but now that Guy Baker is involved, my agreeable position is no longer agreeable. I’ll be watching a little more closely now, along with everyone else, the professionals do their work, and if this shallow stretch of river doesn’t turn up a body soon, I’m going to start wondering if we have ANOTHER inconvenient death for the narrative controllers to manage.
Stay tuned.
And, if you appreciate the work I’m doing, please consider donating to Travis’ Impact Fund (TIF). Any little bit helps, like Mr. Warrens recent donations–thank you!
And, as always, thanks for reading!




