
Math isn’t technically considered a language, but it’s been referred to as “the language of nature” by thinkers like Galileo, who had to appeal to theological enforcers of religious dogma at the time of his philosophical work when making his appeal.
For context, this article is worth considering. Here’s an excerpt:
In his argument with the Aristotelians and the theologians Galileo was operating on an uneven playing field. Theology based on the Bible and the works of the Church Fathers was certain knowledge. Aristotelian physics was knowledge but mathematical astronomy was not knowledge and mathematical physics was a contradiction in terms. The knowledge hierarchy was a pyramid with theology at the top and Aristotelian physics at the bottom the mathematical sciences were not knowledge delivery systems. Galileo tried to challenge the system with what was, in essence, a theological and not a scientific argument. He proposed that God had written two books the Bible and the Book of Nature. The Bible was the word of God and so had to be interpreted by theologians whereas the Book of Nature, and here comes our title quote, is written in the language of mathematics and therefore must be interpreted by mathematicians. Galileo wanted his opponents to consider the two books as being of equal importance and equal significance. He went even further along what could only prove to be a hopeless path, under the circumstances, he claimed that the Bible, that is the word of God, was open to interpretation and therefore variable whereas the Book of Nature was unambiguous and therefore when read would deliver an indisputable truth.
Before we get to Ashley Flowers–the true crime podcaster who I’m using for the face of this post–and the Utah “rape” victim, who made her Utah University the rape capitol of America by suggesting her intimate partner raped her over a hundred times, I want to explain what I mean by “Sheriff math”.
The term is a hyper-local one I made up a few years ago after my confounding experience with the Missoula County Sheriff’s Office when a sex offender assaulted TWO state employees during a volunteer homeless camp cleanup and received only ONE misdemeanor charge, leading me to ask the Sheriff’s Office (back when they would actually respond to me) how TWO victims could only equal ONE criminal complaint? One of those “victims”, I was told, had not reported a significant degree of fear, so the judgement call was made to only issue the assailant one citation, which is how I arrived at the conclusion that Sheriff math means 1 + 1 = 1.
Shifting now to girl math, let’s take a look at how ME + SAD = CRIME because this is a VERY impressive and quite terrifying (if you’re a man who speaks nature math and not cuck math) example of what I’m talking about:

National reports have identified the University of Utah as having the highest number of reported rapes of any university or college in the country.
The school had “nearly double the number logged at the next-highest schools,” the New York Post reported Saturday, citing the 146 reported rapes the U. documented in 2024.
That number is right. But there is context that explains that 2024 count — and there is more recent data that shows the U. has since seen a drop in reported sexual violence since then.
…
The U. has previously attributed its increase in reported rapes for 2024 to one “multiple-month relationship plagued by interpersonal violence.” In total, 110 of the school’s reported rapes in 2024 stemmed from that.
Another 110 were also logged in the dating violence category from that same relationship, the U. explained when 2024 numbers were originally released.
Both the victim and the alleged perpetrator were students at the time, the U. noted, and both had since graduated and left the school.
Girl math is NOT the same thing as lying, which everyone does. Instead it appears to involve an internal alchemy of transformation that allows things like “regret” and “shame” to become CRIME and CRIME and, if those CRIMES are brutal enough, girl math can allow someone like Ashley Flowers to see and cash-in on the opportunity to entertain the predominantly female audience of TRUE CRIME content.
But, when trouble arises in CONTENT CREATOR world, it’s important to understand the kind of strategy that can be utilized by using girl math. Here’s the equation, followed by an excerpt from the article, that explains how Flowers handled internal strife at her company, Audiochuck:
THREAT + HUMAN SHIELD = NO ACCOUNTABILITY

If you don’t understand how the girl math equation translates to its deployment as a strategy, let me spell it out: unhappy staff who are unhappy at your BUSINESS decisions with MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR media deals will be MUCH LESS LIKELY to challenge your shitty leadership if you use your own child as a human shield to deflect the terrible threat of ACCOUNTABILITY from the people you’ve hired, and who are therefore economically dependent on you.
If you continue reading this article at Bloomberg for all the ups and downs, which I won’t be lingering on here, you’ll read excerpts like this one, which I will be putting into deeper context:

While the “newcomers” to the FOR PROFIT business side of Flowers’ TRUE CRIME media operations were left wondering about the NON-PROFIT side, “Season of Justice”, readers of this blog don’t have to wonder because, when you follow the money, you find nests of grifters who can even have lovely ebony skin, like Angela Mew, who claims to have worked for a U.S. Senator, but never says WHO that Senator was.



Angela brings over a decade of expertise in development and nonprofit fundraising, working with organizations that tackle a diverse array of issues, including environmental justice, legal aid, policy and advocacy, health, education, and youth empowerment. Most recently, she served as the Chief Development Officer for a national organization dedicated to engaging BIPOC communities, where she successfully crafted and executed a fundraising strategy that sustained a $20 million operating budget.
Her prior experience includes key roles at Elevate, the Center for Court Innovation, and the Legal Aid Society, where she significantly contributed to fundraising efforts for operating budgets ranging from $10 million to $97 million. Angela began her career at Capalino and Company, a government relations firm in New York City, and also worked in the office of a United States Senator. In addition to serving on the board of Black Excellence, Angela has also served on the Iowa State Foster Care Review Board and as the Foundation Chair of Jack & Jill of America Des Moines Chapter.
She holds a Bachelor’s degree in Economics and Social Sciences, pursued a graduate degree at Harvard University, and completed coursework toward a Juris Doctorate at Northwestern California University School of Law. As a consultant, she remains committed to helping organizations develop compelling, high-quality grant proposals.
When I continued down this girl math rabbit hole with the “Center for Court Innovation” (also known as Justice Innovation) what I found was an org that finally had an equation that could encompass the value of a man (BLACK + MAN = MARKETABLE TOKEN PIC):







Within this 990 form showing the summary narrative, the dollars involved, and a smattering of how fifty million bucks can be distributed across Universities and court reform advocacy groups, the overlap of girl math with cuck math–along with the larger implication of a FINAL EQUATION–can be seen for those with the eyes to see.
Cuck math?
To stop the problem of people who follow money beyond the smokescreen of girl math, cuck math is an important part of the “narrative control” equation, which is why it’s instructive to have a “man” like Kevin Hunt who regularly tells me I’m a misogynist. This happens because FEAR + DESIRE = PERFORMATIVE MALE.

Returning to girl math, the Cornell 7 case is highlighting that CRIMINAL CLAIMS – CRIMINAL CHARGES + CIVIL CLAIMS – EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE = THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION, with an X variable being the deranging incentives of the algo-driven attention economy that are ever-present now in how we consume information.
And no, I don’t think reality can survive this insanity.
For any man right now identifying as a “D”, I’m sorry to report there’s no escaping your submission to the power of cuck math, so why not just accept it, like Sam Forstag did a few days ago in order to gain as many lady votes as possible before we, as a society, start seriously re-thinking that 19th amendment.



With all this cultural detritus to consider, how will regular men and women ever avoid the FINAL EQUATION, which can best be summed up as DIVIDE & CONQUER?
Amazingly, I have a solution, and it starts with returning to the language of math found in the Book of Nature. Hear me out, ladies.
If you have read the Jon Krakauer book about Missoula and campus rape culture, like I did when it first came out, then you know there’s a good lesson in that book about statistically relevant male rapists who truly are serial predators of sexual violence.
On the flip side, as the example in Utah shows, there’s ALSO, I would argue, statistically relevant wolf-cryers who cry wolf about men they regret having relationships with to the point that an entire University had to qualify why they were rising to the top of the watchlist for college sexual assaults.
What I recommend is a GENDERED approach to men finding the statistical aberrations in our tribe, while women can work on finding the wolf-cryers in theirs and, when the work is done, maybe then we can work on finding a way to remove our youth from these hand-held grooming machines destroying any chance they have of being able to engage in the kind of healthy intimate relations we still must still engage in to, you know, propagate the species.
To wrap up today’s post, let’s take a quick look at an image of the political imposter, Alani Bankhead, telling her gullible lady voters that she’s a “Pedo hunter” for U.S. Senate:

Later this week I’ll be writing about the serious problem of reducing the Epstein Network to simply being a problem of “pedophiles” and illegal sex with children because those of us researching STRUCTURAL power know it’s so much more than that.
For now, let me just remind readers of a reality they might not want to acknowledge as more context drips out about the Epstein Network: without key WOMEN in positions of power, like Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein could NEVER have fucked as many underage girls as he’s suspected of fucking.

Thanks for reading!






































