
Before we get to the email that Richard Kahn sent Jeffrey Epstein about Jim Acosta, who will be the keynote speaker for Missoula Democrats this year, let’s examine how critical Kahn was to Epstein’s money network while he was alive AND after Epstein’s supposed “death”:
Kahn was Epstein’s accountant for more than 10 years and became an executor of his estate after his death, CBS News reported. Kahn was one of Epstein’s closest associates in his final years, as he managed the disgraced financier’s investments, finances and other matters, such as renovations on his private island.
Comer said Kahn did not see any interactions with Trump or his family but that Epstein was a financial adviser for ex-Victoria’s Secret CEO Les Wexner, hedge fund manager Glenn Dubin, businessman Steven Sinofsky, the Rothschilds and investor Leon Black. Kahn said he saw large transactions with those five clients.
“Mr. Kahn testified under oath that — because the Democrats asked this question — that he had never seen any type of transaction to Trump or anyone in his family,” Comer told reporters. “That makes the fifth witness now that’s testified under oath that they’ve never seen any involvement by Donald Trump or the family.”
Democrats and Republicans are desperate to keep partisan focus on the bipartisan corruption of our entire political system, which is why a “journalist” like Jim Acosta is so useful. Back in 2017, for example, it was Jim Acosta who sparred with Stephen Miller over immigration, which is why Richard Kahn sent Epstein this email:

The following year, during a White House press conference, Acosta (who’s father immigrated to America from Cuba as a child) got even MORE aggressive, then sued the White House when the administration cut off his press access. Here’s some context from Acosta’s Wikipedia page:
On November 13, 2018, CNN and Acosta, through counsel Ted Boutrous and Ted Olson of Gibson Dunn, filed civil suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against Trump, White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, Deputy Chief of Staff/Director of Communications Bill Shine, Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the U.S. Secret Service and its director, Randolph Alles, and an unnamed Secret Service agent, all in their official capacities. The filing also requested relief by way of an order temporarily restraining the White House from denying access to Acosta for journalistic purposes.
Amicus briefs were filed with the court in support of CNN’s case, from journalistic entities whose editorial policies range across the political spectrum. The U.S. Department of Justice filed a brief arguing that First Amendment free speech rights do not “restrict the president’s ability to determine the terms on which he does, or does not, engage with particular journalists.”
The case was heard by Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee to the District Court for the District of Columbia, who, on November 16, ordered Acosta’s credentials restored for 14 days, owing to the court’s belief that Acosta’s due-process rights likely had been violated, with the court’s making no reference of the suit’s arguments thus far concerning the First Amendment.
CNN eventually dropped the lawsuit on November 19 after the White House restored Acosta’s press credentials with conditions, including that reporters called upon would be limited to one question with no follow-up questions unless granted permission.
Acosta wrote about the incident in his 2019 book The Enemy of the People: A Dangerous Time to Tell the Truth in America.
What I believe Kahn and Epstein saw in Acosta’s “journalism” was an attack on the core strategy Democrats have for maintaining their power: unfettered immigration. Remember, Hillary Clinton had just lost the 2016 election amidst email disclosures and Pizzagate conspiracy theories, and the right wanted a revolution. Once Democrats lost in 2016, these political losers mobilized their mouthpieces across the country to pimp immigration, like Klaus von Stutterheim did from his perch in Seeley Lake.
You see, Missoula Democrats don’t care if women get raped by immigrants and they don’t care about pitting immigrants against locals for very limited housing amidst skyrocketing housing costs. They also give ZERO SHITS about the first amendment, especially if some uppity citizen journalist tries using it to expose THEIR schemes. But don’t tell their keynote speaker this because Jim Acosta is ALL ABOUT speaking “truth to power”.

This fucker didn’t suffer for speaking truth to power, he had high-paid lawyers to litigate for him, a book publisher ready with a book deal, and plenty of Democrats eager to platform him at a dinner fundraiser where King Cuck and Queen Cunt will be honored for all the amazing work they have done to ensure Missoula women can get raped by immigrants instead of just football players and ER doctors.

Pat Williams served Montana with distinction as the state’s longest serving member of the U.S. House of Representatives, representing Montana from 1979 to 1997. During his nine terms in Congress, he championed working families, wilderness conservation, tribal sovereignty, education, the arts, and workers’ rights, leaving a legacy of principled leadership and commitment to Montana values.
Alongside him throughout this journey has been his partner in life and service, Carol Williams. A lifelong advocate for education, environmental protection, and women’s rights, Carol carved her own path in Montana politics. Carol went on to serve in the Montana Legislature, first in the State House and then in the State Senate from 2004 to 2012. During her legislative career she made history as the first woman to serve as both Majority and Minority Leader in the Montana Senate.
Beyond elected office, Carol has continued to support civic engagement and leadership, founding what is now known as Carol’s List, an organization dedicated to recruiting and supporting progressive, pro-choice women candidates for public office in Montana.
If you think I’m being too harsh and offensive by referring to a progressive, pro-choice woman as QUEEN CUNT, well, that’s the first amendment for you! And Democrats support the first amendment, right? I mean, it’s not like they’re bigoted identity pimps and DEI racists creating an overall atmosphere stifling free expression, right?

It’s always impressive to see dollar amounts on plates for shindigs like the Missoula Democrats are throwing because it’s a reminder, at least for me, of the kind of money that floats around when your politics trumps your ethics and morals. When politics are jettisoned for principles, it’s more a matter of publicly begging for GoFundMe money while privately conveying the pros and cons of financially securing rare glass spheres.
Thanks for reading!





















