Zoom Chron Blog

On Wednesday Gwen Jones kicked off her Domestic Violence Forum because men are murdering women and it’s a real nightmare. But don’t worry, ladies, Gwen Jones wants to curate FACTS and AWARENESS on this “Community Issue”, so she’s talking to legislators and they will be “leaning in” on legislating domestic violence during the upcoming legislative session.

Hmmm.

In the propaganda rag run by Martin Kidston, the Missoual Current, Marty echoed the intent to “curate” testimony on domestic violence, but then omitted something very telling.

With domestic violence on the rise, members of the Missoula City Council and a range of community experts took a deep dive into the issue on Wednesday, from the psychology that drives it to the struggles faced by survivors.

The forum, organized by council member Gwen Jones, looks to raise awareness and curate testimony in hopes of legislative action early next year.

“It’s a huge issue and something we should be talking about,” said Jones. “If people can find out where to get help when they are experiencing harm, that’s a good thing.”

Jones cited a number of high-profile domestic violence incidents that unfolded nationally this year in a single month. In April, former Virginia Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax shot his wife, then himself. In Louisiana, Shamar Elkins killed his wife, her friend and eight children.

A recent national survey found that 34% of women and 17% of men have experienced some form of violence at the hands of an intimate partner in their lifetime. In Montana, the statistics are higher, reaching 38% of women and 24% of men.

What did Martin Kidston strategically omit in this excerpt? Well, when you listen to the SECOND clip from Gwen Jones’ introduction to this “community issue”, Kidston forgot to include the statistic that SAME SEX couples are experiencing HIGHER RATES of domestic violence, with the number cited by Gwen Jones for transexual relationships nearing 50%.

I guess this statistic doesn’t help the misandrist MAN HATERS who are clearly driving this agenda for political purposes.

When I hear “curated” examples that only highlight male violence toward women, then see in a local media rag the omission that hides this same type of violence between same sex couples, I have a pretty good idea what’s coming, and who will be involved.

One person who did NOT involve herself in this performance yesterday at the Committee of the Whole was Kristen Jordan, a notorious no-show to her Council job and a person I was eager to hear from, since Kristen Jordan seems VERY INVESTED in identifying potentially sexually abusive males who make politically connected women in Missoula feel the kind of feelings that can quickly become civil legal action.

I consider this depiction of me to be criminal defamation, since it’s COMPLETELY UNTRUE, but I think we all know truth no longer matters to legal processes, so that’s why I’ve continued advocating for myself after leaving this toxic relationship three years ago where it was ME who was AND IS being stalked by seriously troubled individuals (yes, plural).

In the Cornell 7 case, where a woman got disinvited to a Halloween party and decided to go scorched earth on as many men as she could get vengeance on, the latest revelation is that, WHOOPSIE, she mis-identified the frat president, so his name has been dropped from the lawsuit.

The “Cornell 7” Jane Doe dropped a man from her lawsuit whom she wrongly identified as president of the school’s Chi Phi fraternity — whose members she claims gang raped her.

Doe, who has accused seven Chi Phi brothers of sexually assaulting her at a party in October 2024, initially named Orazio Petito in her civil lawsuit, which she filed last month.

Petito, who was mistakenly identified as the chapter’s president, was not accused of sexual assault.

In another case of a woman making life-ruining claims that didn’t pan out how she intended, an MIT professor just got a handsome payout for the hell this lawfare-wielding woman put him through.

6 million sounds like a totally reasonable sum of money to pay this man in what will inevitably be part of an emerging #HeToo counter-movement (it should be noted this man had to deal with this for FIVE YEARS before winning in court):

A former Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) scientist won a legal victory this week after losing his position following sexual misconduct allegations made by a female colleague.

Dr. David Sabatini, a former MIT biology professor and prominent biomedical researcher, was awarded $6 million in damages Friday after a jury found that his former colleague, Dr. Kristin Knouse, had defamed him.

At the time of the allegations, Sabatini had led a research lab at the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for approximately 24 years.

Returning to Montana, I’m very glad Gwen Jones confirmed my suspicion that violent gay couples are being statistically considered, since my article on the ombudsman bill being worked on gave me some insights into how the VERY HIGH incarceration rates for WOMEN is part of this pre-legislation narrative framing coming from some sus people, like Cat and Zooey.

When I connected this legislative effort to the astroturf non-profit, Catalyst Montana, the women who allegedly want to help incarcerated men and women get enough protein in jail got a little nervous.

Since I’m now being blocked by the “conservative” who doesn’t like liberal cult members unless they’re using her for their legislative agenda, I think now would be a good time to show my attempt to reach out to “406 Revolutionized” about the ombudsman bill, since reaching out to Amanda McKnight caused Cat Holley to call me on my phone and berate me for making her new liberal friends a little worried about my scrutiny.

If Cat Holley wants to play legislative games with Catalyst Montana for the Republicans she’s working for, like Austin Knudsen, fine, but calling my writing “unhinged” after blocking me is all I need to know about this political foot soldier and her goals for her adopted state, and how much they DO NOT ALIGN with my hyper-local efforts to expose of local corruption, regardless of the political parties involved.

I know accountability is a scary thing for women in power, but just imagine if Gwen Jones had been a man when she abused her board position at Missoula Aging Services to verbally abuse me for writing a poem, an act the HR department required her to write me an apology letter for in order to keep me from suing my then-employer:

Nope, still not interested in this apology, because I’m not done exposing how power is being abused in this town as “domestic violence” gets political attention from manipulative local power brokers desperate to avoid the scrutiny they know is coming.

Thanks for reading!

While it might seem unfair to call a female firefighter a “cultural arsonist” for figuratively torching what she can’t have, I’m appreciative that Tara Walker is doing what she’s doing to the awful men who made her time at the Hamilton Rural Fire Department so very bad by doing things like not sitting next to her at a training, or not backing her up when an angry wife said something mean to her.

Walker’s elation was short-lived. She said that at the very first training she attended, everyone was sitting as far away from her as possible.

“I could tell that I was not going to be welcomed into the department like other firefighters were,” said Walker.

But she started training, working really hard. “They saw that I could do the job,” she said.

Then, last summer at an appreciation dinner, Walker said one of the firefighters’ wives verbally harassed her. She reported it to the fire chief, and she says the incident was turned around on her.

“That’s when I learned they did not have my back… They were more concerned about their image.”

Another serious issue occurred for Tara Walker when the “team” photo became a collage of individual photos because the men, she claims, didn’t want to be near her, perhaps worrying the proximity to a professional victim could put them in legal jeopardy.

Among other things, the new complaint, which was submitted on April 2, 2026, mentions an incident regarding a department photo. This time, all the firefighter photos were taken individually and then put together into a collage format. The finished photo product is dark, and it’s hard to make everyone out. Walker alleges that this was done because the other men did not want to stand with her for a group photo or even be seen with her.

Woods disputes Walker’s claim that the annual photo was planned in a way to minimize her membership on the force.

“We usually try to do a group photo,” said Woods. “But there was no planning made. The night of the photo was windy and rainy, so we had to move inside. It had nothing to do with her.

Actually, when it comes to women like Tara Walker–who leveraged her status as a sexual abuse victim in order to get legislation passed–EVERYTHING that occurs in their orbit is about them and, when there’s a problem, it’s ONLY because of how awesome they are, which, of course, makes everyone else around them jealous.

“I have not shared anything about this for a year… I’ve been so conservative with information over the last year, I’ve just kept my mouth shut about everything, just because I wanted to gain their trust and be part of the department, but now I just want everyone to see what I’ve gone through, what I’ve endured,” said Walker. “I think one of the main reasons they didn’t want me on the department is because they saw I’m someone people listen to when I speak, and that’s probably one of the reasons why I was a danger to their scheme. This is a conscious effort. They’ve been keeping women off the department this whole time. If we don’t change things, they’re going to continue to do so.”

Although I’ve never been a firefighter, I’m pretty sure the skill of charismatic talking isn’t a firefighting characteristic that’s as valued as, say, being able to PHYSICALLY do a very PHYSICALLY DEMANDING job.

Another aspect of being a first responder is the immense psychological impact that exists from putting your own life at risk in order to assist people in crisis situations, so having a person on your team who undermines team cohesion is a SERIOUS RISK, which might have been a contributing factor in the confrontation Tara had with a firefighter’s wife.

In contrast, when confronted with a comment in the comment section of the newspaper article Walker got printed about her noble struggle for all the women out there clamoring to be firefighters, Tara Walker did herself NO FAVORS by engaging with the commenter, who appears to be the Father of her two kids.

If this was all there was to Tara Walker’s series of complaints, then I probably wouldn’t have allowed the Facebook algorithm to lure me into commenting on this rage-bait, but reading through her Google Docs filing (PDF) I found something that made this girl-boss bullshit worth my time, and that’s the role of Lexipol in developing Hamilton’s “Policy 005”:

When I went looking for information about Lexipol and this company’s impact on developing policies for law enforcement I found a Mother Jones article from six years ago, when the country was pretty busy learning how important “policies” could be with regards to that little pandemic we had.

Amidst that confusion, a cop shot and killed a black man who was dangling from a window because he looked aggressive and the cop lied about a gun.

Turns out, this police department has, as its official policy, the ability to kill aggressive black men, even IF they’re dangling from a motel window!

Early one morning in June 2015, after Kris Jackson had been fighting loudly with his girlfriend, a police officer knocked on the door to their motel room a few blocks from California’s Lake Tahoe. Jackson, a Black 22-year-old who was on probation for a drug offense, did not stick around to deal with the cops. Wearing only a pair of shorts, he hoisted himself partway out of the bathroom window into the cool, dark air of the motel’s back alley. That’s when another officer, Joshua Klinge, rounded the corner of the building, spotted Jackson hanging out the window, and shot him from several feet away. Klinge later claimed that Jackson looked “aggressive” and had a gun. No gun was found. Jackson died at the hospital a few hours later.

As in the majority of police killings, the local district attorney did not charge Klinge, who was placed on paid leave before being allowed to retire quietly. Jackson’s parents filed a federal lawsuit against the officer, several police department staff, and the city of South Lake Tahoe, arguing that not only had Klinge used excessive force against their son, but that the police department had an illegal policy allowing him to do so. That policy, written by a company called Lexipol, stated that officers could use deadly force to protect themselves or others from any “imminent” threat of serious injury or death. An “imminent” threat, the policy explained, was broader than an “immediate” threat such as someone pointing a gun. It included any situation in which a “reasonable officer” would believe a suspect had a weapon and intended to use it.

Closer to home–and just two months after Tara Walker filed her Federal discrimination tantrum–the female victimhood mentality combined with the “reasonable officer” standard to kill, as a matter of policy, Ross Robertson, who was in a mental health crisis at the time.

Despite KNOWING the mental health history of the REAL victim here (the dead white guy), Matt Jennings led a performative Coroner’s Inquest where he joked about body weight and allowed the SCARED WOMAN rationale to set-up the justifiable death narrative these “public safety” officers will ALWAYS hide behind when they kill one of us.

One of the CORE POLICIES that makes America so kick-ass is the FIRST and, I would argue, the BEST amendment of the Constitution, which I’ll post in case the hate-readers reading this forgot what it says:

Who might need to hear this? Oh, I don’t know, maybe a Montana lawyer/legislator who supported legislation last year to STOP allegedly “frivolous” lawsuits regarding those First Amendment rights:

A bipartisan effort to prevent frivolous lawsuits regarding 1st Amendment rights continues moving through the legislature with no opposition.

After clearing the House unanimously in mid-February, House Bill 292, known as the Establish the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, passed the Senate Judiciary Committee 8-0 less than an hour after its hearing.

State Reps. Tom Millett (R-Marion) and James Reavis (D-Billings) are both sponsoring the bill.

What could this mean? I don’t know, I’m not a lawyer, but it sounds like there’s also a legislation mill that reproduces legislation from state to state just like Lexipol reproduces its copyrighted “policies” from town to town.

Hmmm.

It is considered Anti-SLAPP legislation, and mirrors what seven other states have already put into law and a handful of others are actively considering, which the sponsors say is a safeguard to protect Montanans against meritless lawsuits that are used to silence critics.

Silencing critics? Wow, there’s a RICH IRONY in this statement, but it’s not one I’m legally able to expound on.

Yet.

Thanks for reading!

Republican candidates, like Aaron Flint, LOVE to hate Missoula because they use this town as a convenient scapegoat exemplifying the failure of leftist policies. Recently this strategy reared its retarded head with a post on Aaron Flint’s Facebook page where he highlighted Missoula’s urban camping/drug addiction problem and made a claim I’m calling BULLSHIT on!

As someone who considers himself a Homeless Industrial Complex whistleblower credibly warning about a “non-profit” grift for YEARS, I would REALLY like to know HOW exactly Aaron Flint has “fought back against all of it” because NO YOU HAVEN’T!

Did Aaron Flint have anything to say when the REPUBLICAN Governor, Greg Gianforte, gave a quarter of his annual salary to one of the MAIN ENABLERS of this corrupt homeless system in Missoula, Susan Hay Patrick?

Or, was Aaron Flint a little bitch who kept his mouth shut because he’s a partisan talking head with not much else going on in his little partisan brain?

Two years before Greg Gianforte gave United Way money to help Susan Hay Patrick control the homeless narrative for Montana Democrats, Aaron Flint DID notice some homeless drama in Missoula, which he covered like the media punk that he is.

Pathetic.

One of the big complaints with liberal cities like Portland, Seattle, and Missoula is that when you build massive homeless shelters or allow homeless camps, you encourage the transient population to move in and take hold. A frequent criticism of the city’s housing problem by Missoulians is that “if you build it, they will come.” John Jackson used the Field of Dreams analogy with this story as well:

I also thought that it was pretty ironic that some of the same Left-leaning folks who are all about forcing masks on people, sure as heck didn’t like the fact that private security guards were wearing masks while patrolling a homeless encampment in Missoula. And what I said back in August sadly still applies today towards the end of December: Maybe we can take this opportunity to end these absurd mask mandates for our healthcare personnel and veterans once and for all?

For Aaron Flint, who had one of the biggest media platforms for conservatives in the state at the time of this “news” article, the drama within one of Missoula’s homeless programs was just an opportunity to take a political shot at the mask mandate from the other side of the state.

If this is what a Veteran like Flint considers “fighting”, no wonder America can’t win wars anymore, foreign or domestic. Like, say, the WAR ON DRUGS.

Is this why kids got NARCAN at a recent parade in Missoula instead of candy? Because this kind of defeatist, pro-cartel insanity (keeping addicts alive to make cartels more money) actually happened, according to a comment on Aaron Flint’s Facebook post about Missoula’s homeless transient problem.

The last comment in this curated comment thread comes from Mike Dominick, a former member of the Missoula County Sheriff’s Office who I interacted with regarding the disappearance of Monte Swanson, a homeless man who WAS from Missoula before being killed, I believe, by the serial killer I tried helping Missoula cops catch, Kevin Lino (who came from the land of Massholes).

Another local known to law enforcement without a consistent residence in Missoula (who I wrote about recently in relation to the death of Johnny Lee Perry) seems to be a current problem who, because of his threatening conduct online, had to be banned from a Facebook page after making threats to the people who voluntarily clean up homeless trash in the dirt parking lot owned by Brad Morris, the proprietor of Snowbowl.

Here’s what Jack Maxvill looks like, along with an example of his online commentary, because locals should PROTECT THEMSELVES by understanding someone like this is reportedly involved (according to my source) with organized panhandling and, I suspect, quite possibly drug and/or human trafficking, but at a low enough level that he’s allowed to to behave in this manner because of what I’m going to start calling HEADLINE policing as opposed to STREET policing, which I’ll explain in a moment.

From my vantage point, Jack is just a Mineral County boy exhibiting that criminal persistence to keep hustling that makes a street-wise citizen journalist like me wonder if he’s one of the many informants working covertly with law enforcement, but, being street-wise, I have to remind myself that most people rely on more official HEADLINES to gauge what’s going on in their own backyard, not street wisdom, so this “policing for headlines” thing is a phenomenon I’m particularly frustrated by (I’ll write more about this in a later post).

While Jack Maxvill does his thing at the I-90/Reserve Street exit, and Aaron Flint does his thing pretending he’s fought against transient drug culture, I continue to walk around in my own neighborhood documenting urban camp whack-a-mole, which Missoula is spending MILLIONS doing because we’re led by corrupt fucktards and professional victims.

Have I mentioned how much I despise this town recently? Because I really do.

The area where I documented this trash earlier this month had just been cleaned a few days previous, and the new pile of trash was now on PRIVATE land instead of public, hence the whack-a-mole reference.

Since I like to actually contextualize the drug impacts happening in this town without casting partisan blame, I’m not just documenting trash in order to publish poverty porn, like those Discovery Institute grifters.

No, I’m interested in showing WHY the merry-go-round continues, and it’s because partisan critics can only criticize the SMALL SLICE of reality that avoids their own teams’ complicity in this bullshit.

While Sam Forstag, according to his own Wikipedia page, once lobbied to get money for Missoula to perpetuate things like United Way’s NARCAN program…

After graduation in 2017, he took a job as a wildland firefighter in order to pay off student loan debt, intending to apply to law school. Instead he served as a wildland firefighter for eight years, including four years as a smokejumper. During the off seasons, he worked as an organizer and lobbyist for the Montana chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union and for lobbying group Central House Strategies, where he represented the city of Missoula.

…Aaron Flint carries narrative control water for the other side of this issue, and that’s the harder-to-see corruption of local law enforcement as Montana’s Attorney General, Austin Knudsen, positions himself to run for Governor.

To finish up today’s post I’d like to congratulate United Way of Missoula County’s CEO, Susan Hay Patrick, for being one of many intelligent rats jumping ship amidst the well-deserved collapse of their political party in Montana. If anyone is responsible for taking a 10 Year Plan to “end” homelessness and doing the exact opposite, it’s this nasty woman:

While overseeing the expansion of the Homeless Industrial Complex in Missoula has taken a visual toll on this non-profit operator, I hope her mind is sharp enough to remember the good ‘ol days, when my relative youth and systemic ignorance made me an ideal foot-soldier in her money/politics/culture games.

After watching Susan say “good trouble” last night with that fake-ass smile, then going through all the individuals at City Council who are apparently “stuck” with her (was that a threat for her co-conspirators to keep their mouths shut?), I turned off my computer before I got lured into calling in and using words to commit some new felony.

I’ll safe that kind of criminal conduct for this free blog, which you can support financially here if you care.

Thanks for reading!

Thanks to a Christian podcast called The Confessionals I recently became aware of Project Meridian and a “non-profit” called the Mitre Corporation that Forbes suggested could be the most important organization you’ve never heard of.

Before we get to the Mitre Corporation, though, let’s get a basic breakdown of Project Meridian:

The Pentagon’s newly announced Future of Warfare initiative will aim to fundamentally transform U.S. military doctrine and deliver a blueprint for how American forces can succeed in a world of rapidly evolving technology and artificial intelligence, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said.

Mr. Gingrich, tapped by the Trump administration to co-lead the effort alongside SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and Palmer Luckey, co-founder of the defense technology firm Anduril, said the group will deliver a study by the end of January that aims to gain bipartisan support for “huge structural reforms that we need in our national security system.”

Ok, with the main players tapped by the Trump administration for Project Meridian established, here’s what Forbes had to say about Mitre six years ago as Covid-19 gave this government R&D arm a privileged position at Uncle Sam’s feeding trough:

Whether it’s an invisible Aston Martin or an exploding pen, whenever James Bond needs a high-tech edge, he heads right for Q and his secretive MI6 lab. In the real world, American agents often rely on a less clandestine, but far better-funded group. Armed with 8,000 employees and an annual budget of between $1 billion and $2 billion of taxpayers’ money, Mitre Corp., a government-linked Skunk Works, has been making bleeding-edge breakthroughs for U.S. agencies for more than six decades. With its HQ housed in four towers atop a hill in McLean, Virginia, Mitre’s research centers employ some of the nation’s leading computer scientists and engineers to build digital tools for America’s top military, security and intelligence organizations.

Among the government’s wilder Mitre orders: a prototype tool that can hack into smartwatches, fitness trackers and home thermometers for the purposes of homeland security; software to collect human fingerprints from social media websites like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter for the FBI; support in building what the FBI calls the biggest database of human anatomy and criminal history in the world; and a study to determine whether someone’s body odor can show they’re lying.

These varied, multimillion-dollar projects, revealed in hundreds of pages of contract details obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests, as well as interviews with former Mitre executives and government officials, provide just a glimpse into this sprawling contractor’s secretive world. Mitre’s influence goes far beyond its vast tech development; it’s also a major consultant for myriad government agencies on how best to deploy tech and policy strategies. Its latest gig: helping the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (the CDC) and Homeland Security’s ominously named Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction office craft sweeping plans for curtailing the Covid-19 pandemic.

After doing a smash-up job helping America “curtail” the Covid-19 pandemic, Mitre announced its role in Project Meridian earlier this month at its website:

The Department of War has commissioned MITRE to lead Project Meridian, an independent initiative on the future of warfare. The effort examines the technologies and operational concepts required to sustain U.S. military advantage across the full spectrum of future warfighting domains.

MITRE brings decades of experience working at the intersection of national security, technology, and the public interest. Its mission-immersed technical experts will apply deep understanding of warfighter needs, systems-level perspective, and rigorous, objective analysis to assess emerging technologies and their implications for future military operations.

And here’s the announcement (PDF) from our War Department:

Three days after Trump made this announcement about Montana’s selection for Project Meridian (which made Tim Sheehy and Steve Daines very happy), the Montana Free Press highlighted what’s already been reported about Montana’s “public/private” collaborations with innovation across the state:

“The U.S. faces a clear choice: adapt and expand our development infrastructure to the realities of modern warfare, or risk falling behind adversaries who iterate faster,” Sheehy’s statement said in part. “Montana is uniquely positioned to spearhead the development of the next generation of instruments for the warfighter.”

In his speech Wednesday, Trump said that Sheehy and fellow U.S. Senator Steve Daines had repeatedly lobbied for the testing range in Montana.

The news agency Reuters pointed out that the state is already home to the Montana Spaceport and Test Range and the Montana Innovation Campus, which are public-private aerospace projects with sites near Helena, Billings and Townsend. It’s not known if the forthcoming super range will involve these facilities.

While future details of the Montana Super Range are unknown, the history of the Mitre Corporation is less murky. Here’s a bit of Mitre’s origin story from its Wikipedia page:

MITRE formed in 1958 as a military think tank, spun out from the radar and computer research at the MIT Lincoln Laboratory. Over the years, MITRE’s field of study has greatly diversified. In the 1990s, with the winding down of the Cold War, private companies complained that MITRE had an unfair advantage competing for civilian contracts; in 1996 this led to the civilian projects being spun off to a new company, Mitretek. Mitretek was renamed Noblis in 2007.

And here’s another notable project the Mitre Corporation had a role in via its history with the U.S. Air Force:

U.S. military forces, especially the Air Force, were primary initial sponsors; according to Air Force Magazine, MITRE was created “as a special-purpose technical not-for-profit firm to perform the SAGE systems-engineering job”. The aerial warfare service branch had struggled to identify a for-profit corporation to develop the defense system, so MITRE was hired to serve as the system engineer. MITRE subsequently designed air defense systems for the U.S. and allies, improving aircraft and missile tracking as well as communication interception abilities. The company also helped design the Cheyenne Mountain Complex facility in Colorado operating the North American Air Defense system.

With successes like curtailing Covid-19 and helping America’s stellar air-defense, which only had that one whoopsie on 9/11, maybe it would be helpful to see what kind of money floats around a “non-profit” like the Mitre Corporation:

Wow, those are some BIG numbers, but I guess that’s what it takes to keep up with China.

Moving on to Epstein, Mitre popped up in connection to Noam Chomsky and MIT in this article discussing that awkward Epstein connection.

Interesting.

Linguists at an MIT-offshoot called the MITRE Corporation were particularly interested in Chomsky’s ideas. As their lead researcher, Donald Walker, wrote, ‘Our linguistic inspiration was (and still is) Chomsky’s transformational approach.’ As many as ten of Chomsky’s linguistics students conducted research at MITRE – work that was always intended to support the ‘development of US Air Force-supplied command and control systems’.

…

In the light of this, and especially considering MITRE’s involvement in the Vietnam War, the one institution we might have expected the anti-militarist Chomsky to avoid would have been the MITRE Corporation. It appears, however, that Chomsky worked as a ‘consultant’ both for MITRE and for the SDC, another corporation involved in nuclear weapons command and control.

With this connection to Chomsky (and through Chomsky, Epstein) I wondered what the Epstein Files might have on Mitre so I put the word in the search bar and found this:

What else might I find in the Epstein Files related to this project? Since Newt Gingrich is being named as one of the three main players in Project Meridian (along with Elon Musk and Palmer Luckey), I decided to plug Newt’s name into the Epstein search bar to see what I could find and what I found is Newt’s desire to establish a moon colony.

Hmmm.

While men get plenty of credit for being warmongers, the future of war also has some impressive women helping develop the future of killing and controlling enemies for Uncle Sam, so let’s end today’s post with one of those warmongering ladies involved with the Mitre Corporation:

Ravich began her government career working for Vice President Dick Cheney, rising to become his principal deputy national security advisor. From 2011 to 2013, she co-chaired the bipartisan National Commission for the Review of R&D Programs for the U.S. Intelligence Community.

She was appointed vice chair of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, an independent element within the Executive Office of the President in 2018 and served as co-chair of the Department of Energy Artificial Intelligence Working Group from 2019 to 2021. Ravich also held a seat on the bipartisan Cyberspace Solarium Commission, established in 2019 to develop a national strategy to defend against cyberattacks.

…

Ravich holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania, and a Ph.D. from the RAND Graduate School in Santa Monica, Calif. In her off hours, she is a mediocre golfer and a beginner HAM radio operator.

For more context on Montana, space tech, and the future of America’s war machine, here is a post I wrote earlier this year worth reading:

“On Making The Space Great Again…For The Epstein Class!“

If you appreciate my local citizen journalism and all the things you learn for free reading my posts, please consider donating to my new GoFundMe page. I am very broke and still dealing with the unceasing assault of lawfare by those who don’t want me exposing their corruption, so any little bit helps.

Thanks for reading!

Yesterday, on the phone, a Bozeman Detective confirmed that the alleged suspect in the murder of Shelli Waltemath was the person I thought it was, a former homeless client I knew from years ago by the name of Steven Dailey.

Beyond reportedly knowing that Dailey was from Missoula, not much else is being said about how Steven Dailey may have known Shelli Waltemath, or what the motivation might have been.

Without any substantive information beyond the basic facts being reported by authorities, I went to Facebook to see what kind of chatter was happening and found relevant comments that helped me piece together a timeline of Steven Dailey’s history with the victim and when I believe he arrived in Missoula.

Steven Dailey’s arrival in 2007 overlaps with my time at the Poverello Center, the homeless shelter I started working at in 2008 as an Americorps VISTA. I remember Steven from those early years as a quiet man who was short and heavyset with dirty blond hair and a beard he kept trimmed, meaning he wasn’t immediately recognizable as someone using homeless services, just an average, nondescript dude who kept to himself.

Or did he?

From my limited interactions with Steven Dailey when he was using services I knew he wasn’t dumb, but something was definitely “off” about him. Many clients back then had some degree of substance abuse issues, but I don’t recall that ever being an issue for Mr. Dailey, nor were there any obvious signs of a debilitating mental disorder that I can remember.

So what was up with him?

While most of the clients from back then have faded from memory, Steven Dailey was someone I kept seeing around Missoula, mostly downtown, and almost always at Break Espresso, hence the image at the top of the post. He was always by himself and, besides noticing his presence, I don’t recall much else.

Thinking that perhaps Steven Dailey was renting a room above Charlie B’s, I called the bar this morning and actually got Charlie on the phone, but after getting about 30 seconds into explaining why I was calling, Charlie hung up on me, right after I said Steven’s name.

Ok, Charlie, maybe you’ll be more communicative to Bozeman Detectives when they call, assuming, of course, they’re interested in asking a question I’m now asking myself on this cold Sunday morning.

Here’s the question: is Shelli Waltemath the FIRST woman Steven Dailey has murdered?

It would have been nice to ask Charlie my question in person, which I would have done if it wasn’t for the 1,500 foot radius of Travis exclusion currently being reviewed by the Montana Supreme Court, making in-person inquiries about a murderer living quietly in Missoula a chargeable felony for me right now.

If Missoula ever got serious about reviewing patterns of death in this part of the state, a person like Steven Dailey might be worth examining closer, but there’s a good chance that won’t happen. Not in a town that barley blinked when a nameless corpse was found on a popular hiking trail right by the campus where thousands of college kids get their alleged “education”.

The Missoula Police Department is investigating after a hiker discovered a deceased male near the three-mile marker of the Kim Williams Trail on Wednesday afternoon.

Officers responded to the area just before 3:30 p.m. on November 12 after receiving the report from the hiker who found what appeared to be a body.

MPD’s Detective Division and the Missoula County Sheriff’s Office Coroner are conducting the investigation.

The body of the deceased male has been transported to the Montana State Crime Lab for further investigation and identification.

Police said the individual’s identity will be released after a positive identification has been made and next of kin have been notified.

Was the identity ever released? No. Does anyone care? Apparently not. For anyone who does care, I figured out the body was most likely the body of Mike Condo, a name that I released in this blog post four months ago, in June, just 9 days before the day of my alleged crime, which I’ll be getting a trial for on December 11th.

For more context on Mike Condo and the woman I’d be interrogating if the investigation of corpses was MY job, here’s an article I found with the common narrative elements so prevalent in stories like these, which is meth and my former employer, the Poverello Center:

On December 5, 2024, a Missoula Police Department Officer was dispatched to the area of the Stone Creek Lodge. The reporting party was a hotel employee who requested that law enforcement respond and remove two individuals. The two individuals were later identified as 44-year-old Shana Lincoln and 59-year-old Michael Condo.

The officer arrived and located the two near a vehicle. The officer informed Condo why he was there and requested ID. Condo told the officer that it was in the vehicle. While the Condo was retrieving his wallet, the officer heard something drop to the ground and saw a syringe loaded with a crystalline substance. The officer instructed Condo to turn around and detained him in handcuffs.

According to court documents, Condo told the officer that the syringe contained methamphetamine, which he purchased from someone near the Poverello Center. Condo also gave the officer verbal consent to search the van. Condo told the officer that everything in the van was his, except for Lincoln’s purse and backpack.

While bringing attention to this kind of stuff doesn’t win me any friends with tourism boosters and other invested interests selling our mountain paradise to outsiders, there was that appearance of my name in a New York rag talking serial killers that I can point to when it comes to actual cases I was actually involved in, like Kevin Lino’s.

While designating a killer like Kevin Lino as a serial killer, or not, is now a matter of modern semantics, the meta-issue of narrative control continues to be a massive point of frustration for me as I see things in my own community and keep making the mistake of SAYING SOMETHING about those things with the dumb expectation that if enough people simply know what’s happening, they might be inclined to do something more than bitch and moan on social media about it.

Instead of just letting things happen, let’s remember it was a CITIZEN who took down our baby-faced serial killer, Wayne Nance, half a century ago, and it was a BROTHER who broke the Unabomber case, not a female FBI Agent who never existed, so if there’s any shred of concern left for objective truth, it’s going to be up to those outside conventional structures of authority who are going to have to find and preserve it.

Thanks for reading!

P.S. when it’s safer for me to do so, I’m hoping to get back to posting my research on Substack soon.