
After failing to pay rent for several months, and a subsequent physical altercation with his roommate, the man pictured above, who goes by “Jim”, got a local court to implement a temporary order of protection to keep him safe.
To better understand this process, here are the statutes and legal language that describes this concept, and the requirements that need to be met, in order to get legally protected.

With this in mind, let’s ask ourselves a simple question: why would a person who is feeling so unsafe that they seek a Temporary Order of Protection choose to go to a physical location where they know the person they are terrified of will be? If there truly exists a “REASONABLE APPREHENSION” of danger, wouldn’t this act undermine that claim?
Yesterday, during the anti-war protest that’s been happening on Fridays at 12:30pm every week for years, Brandon Bryant, the JSOC drone-program whistleblower, was in attendance when his former roommate saw him from across the street and CHOSE to close the gap.
My understanding is that Brandon Bryant ALSO has a temporary protection order against “Jim”, who has a more accurate name that he doesn’t like circulating, since the name “Bryce Walker” connects to his incest conviction and the requirement that he register as a sex offender here in Missoula.

I wonder if the people at the Missoula Interfaith Collaborative know about this history, since “Jim” seems to have some kind of official role at this non-profit working with marginalized populations from a faith-based perspective (meaning suckers for a redemptive sob story from convicted pedophiles).

Not only did I see all this trouble for Brandon Bryant brewing back in August, when I wrote the preemptive threat assessment that I later expounded on in this post about the cultural context of a double homicide related to drug trafficking, I’ve been the only one to continue writing about Bryant’s alleged assault of the four badges who beat and tased him for not putting his stick down fast enough.
The combination of stick and verbal stones landed Brandon Bryant in serious trouble before, five years ago, but, after just two hours of deliberation, a jury of his peers returned a not guilty verdict in 2021 on the felony intimidation charge he faced and beat:
A Missoula District Court jury took just two hours to acquit a veteran accused of intimidating the City Council.
In 2020, Brandon Bryant landed in jail shortly after he brought a wooden Japanese training sword to a council meeting and criticized the use of special property tax money.
Prosecutors used that and an edited video of Bryant to charge him with a felony.
This week, three council members, Bryan von Lossberg, Gwen Jones and Julie Merritt all told the jury Bryant scared them.
But four council members and the mayor testified they did not fear him.
The feelings of City Council were VERY important in the County Attorney’s attempt to criminally charge Brandon Bryant five years, but when someone approached HIM at Charlie B’s just five months ago and called him a WOKE FAGGOT, to his face, leading to an brief altercation after Brandon’s attempt to video record this man’s aggression was cut short by a physical attack, our local authorities made NO EFFORT to investigate what happened INSIDE the bar, nor any effort to secure video evidence of this altercation, which led to the 911 call, which led to our four terrified and apparently poorly trained Missoula police officer resorting to excessive force on an officially disabled Veteran.


While Brandon Bryant has done himself NO favors by how his subsequent online posts have expressed anger and feelings of abandonment and persecution–posts which have led to additional criminal charges that will be adjudicated by this town’s criminal “justice” system–there’s a wide-range of data one might consider that doesn’t overtly name people loudly and angrily, but nonetheless should be considered when parsing out what might be happening. Having gone through something similar myself, I went scrolling through “Jim’s” publicly available Facebook posts to see if any red flags appeared, like perhaps a more subtle effort to gaslight someone by implying they are “crazy”.

I offer this tidbit of context because, as someone who has been meeting on a weekly basis with the person I believe “Jim” is referring to here, I’ve had nothing but good interactions, including chats about how to manage strong feelings while being actively targeted, thus triggered, leading to responses that can occur in physiological ways when you have PTSD and other underlying issues from serving in America’s armed forces.
When I had a temporary restraining order put in place nearly three years ago now, the “substitute” municipal judge who knew my “petitioner” denied the objection I raised, denied my request for a postponement, since I lacked legal counsel and she did not, and then the substitute judge (Judge Streano was on vacation, I was told) also ignored one of the final emails I received from my petitioner when I tried leaving this year-long, toxic relationship.
If this was a football game, and I was Brandon Bryant’s football coach, I would remind him that it’s usually the “reaction” that gets the flag or penalty. I’ve also been trying to explain that, at the end of the day, unless more conventional media takes on our stories, no one is going to care about our Facebook posts or blog posts.
What I’m trying to do here, with this one, is share some of that highly valued “lived experience” our victim culture loves strategically deploying for their preferred demographics of dependency. In the spirit of lived experience, imagine trying to breakup up from someone and receiving this set of conditions followed by four consequences of saying no:



Before I get to the consequences, I will add that the people closest to me advised me to stop all contact. Was that good advice?
I don’t know, but from a more objective vantage point, I think the advice Brandon Bryant got yesterday from BOTH his therapist and Public Defender to self-report for clarification at the police station after NOT getting initially arrested was not good advice. Instead of clarification, Bryant was arrested and is currently sitting at the Missoula County Detention Facility.

Thanks to an eerily similar process, I also spent time at this facility because I didn’t think further direct engagement with someone exhibiting signs of borderline personality disorder making unreasonable demands and issuing threats which were definitely followed through on with maximum impact.

While I wouldn’t wish the experiences of lawfare on anyone, there are valuable lessons I have acquired along the way, so sometime next week I may try to explain why Sheriffs running county jails across the country might look at sex offenders differently than the general public thinks they would.
Next week will also be a challenging one for Mr. Bryant, who will exit jail to return to the courtroom for pre-trial hearings as judgement day, once again, comes knocking. And, like so many other local topics I am ahead of the curve on, expect the paid reporters to start covering this story eventually, maybe even the one with the amazing mustache who seemed really grumpy with me for saying hi the other day at Flippers.
Thanks for reading!
UPDATE: in thinking about the comment I highlighted from “Jim’s” Facebook account, the timeline doesn’t fit the “roommate” being Mr. Bryant, but that brings up the question of how offenders go about updating their information regarding where they are staying, something I will look at in a later post.




















