Zoom Chron Blog

Thanks to a Christian podcast called The Confessionals I recently became aware of Project Meridian and a “non-profit” called the Mitre Corporation that Forbes suggested could be the most important organization you’ve never heard of.

Before we get to the Mitre Corporation, though, let’s get a basic breakdown of Project Meridian:

The Pentagon’s newly announced Future of Warfare initiative will aim to fundamentally transform U.S. military doctrine and deliver a blueprint for how American forces can succeed in a world of rapidly evolving technology and artificial intelligence, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said.

Mr. Gingrich, tapped by the Trump administration to co-lead the effort alongside SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and Palmer Luckey, co-founder of the defense technology firm Anduril, said the group will deliver a study by the end of January that aims to gain bipartisan support for “huge structural reforms that we need in our national security system.”

Ok, with the main players tapped by the Trump administration for Project Meridian established, here’s what Forbes had to say about Mitre six years ago as Covid-19 gave this government R&D arm a privileged position at Uncle Sam’s feeding trough:

Whether it’s an invisible Aston Martin or an exploding pen, whenever James Bond needs a high-tech edge, he heads right for Q and his secretive MI6 lab. In the real world, American agents often rely on a less clandestine, but far better-funded group. Armed with 8,000 employees and an annual budget of between $1 billion and $2 billion of taxpayers’ money, Mitre Corp., a government-linked Skunk Works, has been making bleeding-edge breakthroughs for U.S. agencies for more than six decades. With its HQ housed in four towers atop a hill in McLean, Virginia, Mitre’s research centers employ some of the nation’s leading computer scientists and engineers to build digital tools for America’s top military, security and intelligence organizations.

Among the government’s wilder Mitre orders: a prototype tool that can hack into smartwatches, fitness trackers and home thermometers for the purposes of homeland security; software to collect human fingerprints from social media websites like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter for the FBI; support in building what the FBI calls the biggest database of human anatomy and criminal history in the world; and a study to determine whether someone’s body odor can show they’re lying.

These varied, multimillion-dollar projects, revealed in hundreds of pages of contract details obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests, as well as interviews with former Mitre executives and government officials, provide just a glimpse into this sprawling contractor’s secretive world. Mitre’s influence goes far beyond its vast tech development; it’s also a major consultant for myriad government agencies on how best to deploy tech and policy strategies. Its latest gig: helping the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (the CDC) and Homeland Security’s ominously named Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction office craft sweeping plans for curtailing the Covid-19 pandemic.

After doing a smash-up job helping America “curtail” the Covid-19 pandemic, Mitre announced its role in Project Meridian earlier this month at its website:

The Department of War has commissioned MITRE to lead Project Meridian, an independent initiative on the future of warfare. The effort examines the technologies and operational concepts required to sustain U.S. military advantage across the full spectrum of future warfighting domains.

MITRE brings decades of experience working at the intersection of national security, technology, and the public interest. Its mission-immersed technical experts will apply deep understanding of warfighter needs, systems-level perspective, and rigorous, objective analysis to assess emerging technologies and their implications for future military operations.

And here’s the announcement (PDF) from our War Department:

Three days after Trump made this announcement about Montana’s selection for Project Meridian (which made Tim Sheehy and Steve Daines very happy), the Montana Free Press highlighted what’s already been reported about Montana’s “public/private” collaborations with innovation across the state:

“The U.S. faces a clear choice: adapt and expand our development infrastructure to the realities of modern warfare, or risk falling behind adversaries who iterate faster,” Sheehy’s statement said in part. “Montana is uniquely positioned to spearhead the development of the next generation of instruments for the warfighter.”

In his speech Wednesday, Trump said that Sheehy and fellow U.S. Senator Steve Daines had repeatedly lobbied for the testing range in Montana.

The news agency Reuters pointed out that the state is already home to the Montana Spaceport and Test Range and the Montana Innovation Campus, which are public-private aerospace projects with sites near Helena, Billings and Townsend. It’s not known if the forthcoming super range will involve these facilities.

While future details of the Montana Super Range are unknown, the history of the Mitre Corporation is less murky. Here’s a bit of Mitre’s origin story from its Wikipedia page:

MITRE formed in 1958 as a military think tank, spun out from the radar and computer research at the MIT Lincoln Laboratory. Over the years, MITRE’s field of study has greatly diversified. In the 1990s, with the winding down of the Cold War, private companies complained that MITRE had an unfair advantage competing for civilian contracts; in 1996 this led to the civilian projects being spun off to a new company, Mitretek. Mitretek was renamed Noblis in 2007.

And here’s another notable project the Mitre Corporation had a role in via its history with the U.S. Air Force:

U.S. military forces, especially the Air Force, were primary initial sponsors; according to Air Force Magazine, MITRE was created “as a special-purpose technical not-for-profit firm to perform the SAGE systems-engineering job”. The aerial warfare service branch had struggled to identify a for-profit corporation to develop the defense system, so MITRE was hired to serve as the system engineer. MITRE subsequently designed air defense systems for the U.S. and allies, improving aircraft and missile tracking as well as communication interception abilities. The company also helped design the Cheyenne Mountain Complex facility in Colorado operating the North American Air Defense system.

With successes like curtailing Covid-19 and helping America’s stellar air-defense, which only had that one whoopsie on 9/11, maybe it would be helpful to see what kind of money floats around a “non-profit” like the Mitre Corporation:

Wow, those are some BIG numbers, but I guess that’s what it takes to keep up with China.

Moving on to Epstein, Mitre popped up in connection to Noam Chomsky and MIT in this article discussing that awkward Epstein connection.

Interesting.

Linguists at an MIT-offshoot called the MITRE Corporation were particularly interested in Chomsky’s ideas. As their lead researcher, Donald Walker, wrote, ‘Our linguistic inspiration was (and still is) Chomsky’s transformational approach.’ As many as ten of Chomsky’s linguistics students conducted research at MITRE – work that was always intended to support the ‘development of US Air Force-supplied command and control systems’.

…

In the light of this, and especially considering MITRE’s involvement in the Vietnam War, the one institution we might have expected the anti-militarist Chomsky to avoid would have been the MITRE Corporation. It appears, however, that Chomsky worked as a ‘consultant’ both for MITRE and for the SDC, another corporation involved in nuclear weapons command and control.

With this connection to Chomsky (and through Chomsky, Epstein) I wondered what the Epstein Files might have on Mitre so I put the word in the search bar and found this:

What else might I find in the Epstein Files related to this project? Since Newt Gingrich is being named as one of the three main players in Project Meridian (along with Elon Musk and Palmer Luckey), I decided to plug Newt’s name into the Epstein search bar to see what I could find and what I found is Newt’s desire to establish a moon colony.

Hmmm.

While men get plenty of credit for being warmongers, the future of war also has some impressive women helping develop the future of killing and controlling enemies for Uncle Sam, so let’s end today’s post with one of those warmongering ladies involved with the Mitre Corporation:

Ravich began her government career working for Vice President Dick Cheney, rising to become his principal deputy national security advisor. From 2011 to 2013, she co-chaired the bipartisan National Commission for the Review of R&D Programs for the U.S. Intelligence Community.

She was appointed vice chair of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, an independent element within the Executive Office of the President in 2018 and served as co-chair of the Department of Energy Artificial Intelligence Working Group from 2019 to 2021. Ravich also held a seat on the bipartisan Cyberspace Solarium Commission, established in 2019 to develop a national strategy to defend against cyberattacks.

…

Ravich holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania, and a Ph.D. from the RAND Graduate School in Santa Monica, Calif. In her off hours, she is a mediocre golfer and a beginner HAM radio operator.

For more context on Montana, space tech, and the future of America’s war machine, here is a post I wrote earlier this year worth reading:

“On Making The Space Great Again…For The Epstein Class!“

If you appreciate my local citizen journalism and all the things you learn for free reading my posts, please consider donating to my new GoFundMe page. I am very broke and still dealing with the unceasing assault of lawfare by those who don’t want me exposing their corruption, so any little bit helps.

Thanks for reading!

Yesterday, on the phone, a Bozeman Detective confirmed that the alleged suspect in the murder of Shelli Waltemath was the person I thought it was, a former homeless client I knew from years ago by the name of Steven Dailey.

Beyond reportedly knowing that Dailey was from Missoula, not much else is being said about how Steven Dailey may have known Shelli Waltemath, or what the motivation might have been.

Without any substantive information beyond the basic facts being reported by authorities, I went to Facebook to see what kind of chatter was happening and found relevant comments that helped me piece together a timeline of Steven Dailey’s history with the victim and when I believe he arrived in Missoula.

Steven Dailey’s arrival in 2007 overlaps with my time at the Poverello Center, the homeless shelter I started working at in 2008 as an Americorps VISTA. I remember Steven from those early years as a quiet man who was short and heavyset with dirty blond hair and a beard he kept trimmed, meaning he wasn’t immediately recognizable as someone using homeless services, just an average, nondescript dude who kept to himself.

Or did he?

From my limited interactions with Steven Dailey when he was using services I knew he wasn’t dumb, but something was definitely “off” about him. Many clients back then had some degree of substance abuse issues, but I don’t recall that ever being an issue for Mr. Dailey, nor were there any obvious signs of a debilitating mental disorder that I can remember.

So what was up with him?

While most of the clients from back then have faded from memory, Steven Dailey was someone I kept seeing around Missoula, mostly downtown, and almost always at Break Espresso, hence the image at the top of the post. He was always by himself and, besides noticing his presence, I don’t recall much else.

Thinking that perhaps Steven Dailey was renting a room above Charlie B’s, I called the bar this morning and actually got Charlie on the phone, but after getting about 30 seconds into explaining why I was calling, Charlie hung up on me, right after I said Steven’s name.

Ok, Charlie, maybe you’ll be more communicative to Bozeman Detectives when they call, assuming, of course, they’re interested in asking a question I’m now asking myself on this cold Sunday morning.

Here’s the question: is Shelli Waltemath the FIRST woman Steven Dailey has murdered?

It would have been nice to ask Charlie my question in person, which I would have done if it wasn’t for the 1,500 foot radius of Travis exclusion currently being reviewed by the Montana Supreme Court, making in-person inquiries about a murderer living quietly in Missoula a chargeable felony for me right now.

If Missoula ever got serious about reviewing patterns of death in this part of the state, a person like Steven Dailey might be worth examining closer, but there’s a good chance that won’t happen. Not in a town that barley blinked when a nameless corpse was found on a popular hiking trail right by the campus where thousands of college kids get their alleged “education”.

The Missoula Police Department is investigating after a hiker discovered a deceased male near the three-mile marker of the Kim Williams Trail on Wednesday afternoon.

Officers responded to the area just before 3:30 p.m. on November 12 after receiving the report from the hiker who found what appeared to be a body.

MPD’s Detective Division and the Missoula County Sheriff’s Office Coroner are conducting the investigation.

The body of the deceased male has been transported to the Montana State Crime Lab for further investigation and identification.

Police said the individual’s identity will be released after a positive identification has been made and next of kin have been notified.

Was the identity ever released? No. Does anyone care? Apparently not. For anyone who does care, I figured out the body was most likely the body of Mike Condo, a name that I released in this blog post four months ago, in June, just 9 days before the day of my alleged crime, which I’ll be getting a trial for on December 11th.

For more context on Mike Condo and the woman I’d be interrogating if the investigation of corpses was MY job, here’s an article I found with the common narrative elements so prevalent in stories like these, which is meth and my former employer, the Poverello Center:

On December 5, 2024, a Missoula Police Department Officer was dispatched to the area of the Stone Creek Lodge. The reporting party was a hotel employee who requested that law enforcement respond and remove two individuals. The two individuals were later identified as 44-year-old Shana Lincoln and 59-year-old Michael Condo.

The officer arrived and located the two near a vehicle. The officer informed Condo why he was there and requested ID. Condo told the officer that it was in the vehicle. While the Condo was retrieving his wallet, the officer heard something drop to the ground and saw a syringe loaded with a crystalline substance. The officer instructed Condo to turn around and detained him in handcuffs.

According to court documents, Condo told the officer that the syringe contained methamphetamine, which he purchased from someone near the Poverello Center. Condo also gave the officer verbal consent to search the van. Condo told the officer that everything in the van was his, except for Lincoln’s purse and backpack.

While bringing attention to this kind of stuff doesn’t win me any friends with tourism boosters and other invested interests selling our mountain paradise to outsiders, there was that appearance of my name in a New York rag talking serial killers that I can point to when it comes to actual cases I was actually involved in, like Kevin Lino’s.

While designating a killer like Kevin Lino as a serial killer, or not, is now a matter of modern semantics, the meta-issue of narrative control continues to be a massive point of frustration for me as I see things in my own community and keep making the mistake of SAYING SOMETHING about those things with the dumb expectation that if enough people simply know what’s happening, they might be inclined to do something more than bitch and moan on social media about it.

Instead of just letting things happen, let’s remember it was a CITIZEN who took down our baby-faced serial killer, Wayne Nance, half a century ago, and it was a BROTHER who broke the Unabomber case, not a female FBI Agent who never existed, so if there’s any shred of concern left for objective truth, it’s going to be up to those outside conventional structures of authority who are going to have to find and preserve it.

Thanks for reading!

P.S. when it’s safer for me to do so, I’m hoping to get back to posting my research on Substack soon.

In 1946, after the war, Hollywood was excited to produce a film about the O.S.S., America’s predecessor to the C.I.A. Here’s a description from Wikipedia about the studios scrambling to be the first one out with their O.S.S. movie:

Richard Maibaum had just served four years in the army. He returned to Paramount, where he had been a screenwriter, and became a producer. He was assigned the job of writing and producing O.S.S. “Every studio in Hollywood was racing to come out with the first OSS film,” says Maibaum. “When I was in Washington I knew some of the OSS people so I had a head start on the subject.”

The studio had hoped to cast Sterling Hayden who had served in the OSS in real life. However he was still in uniform in early 1946 so the film was assigned to Alan Ladd, whose casting was announced in January 1946. It was one of three movies being made about the OSS in Hollywood around this time, the others being 13 Rue Madeleine and Cloak and Dagger. This resulted in filming taking place in extreme secrecy.

While the filming for this movie took place in secret, the power of movies overall was definitely NOT a secret to those working at the Office of Strategic Services, so today, courtesy of the Decoding Culture Foundation and PsyOp Cinema, I’m highlighting one of the most fascinating documents I’ve come across so far in the archives of DCF:

In assessing the incredible power of motion pictures for the U.S. Government, the Office for Strategic Services clearly indicates a role for targeting U.S. Armed Forces AND civilians in order “to inform and instruct”, “to create attitudes”, “to stimulate or inhibit action”, and “to build morale”.

Jumping forward in time, one year before the C.I.A’s first tweet, Barack Obama got heat for supposedly allowing government propaganda to be disseminated domestically. Here’s how AP News deployed some factual damage control at the time:

I won’t be getting into all the ins and outs of how the Smith-Mundt Act came to be, and whether or not Obama’s move 13 years ago made it “perfectly legal for the media to purposely lie to the American people”, because those nuances don’t seem to matter when entire characters who don’t exist are just made up and inserted into REAL LIFE dramas, like the longest and most expensive hunt for the Unabomber.

To avoid getting distracted by the fake girl-boss character in the bullshit Netflix movie I watched a few days ago, let’s take one brief look at what the conversation surrounding the Smith-Mundt Act was like when this conversation seemed to be more relevant many decades ago:

There are three key restrictions on the U.S. State Department in the Smith–Mundt Act.

The first and most well-known restriction was originally a prohibition on domestic dissemination of materials intended for foreign audiences by the State Department. The original intent was the Congress, the media and academia would be the filter to bring inside what the State Department said overseas. In 1967, the Advisory Commission on Information (later renamed the Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy) recommended the de facto prohibition on domestic distribution be removed noting that there is “nothing in the statutes specifically forbidding making USIA materials available to American audiences. Rather, what began as caution has hardened into policy.”

This changed in 1972 when Senator J. William Fulbright (D-AR) argued that America’s international broadcasting should take its “rightful place in the graveyard of Cold War relics” as he successfully amended the Act to read that any program material “shall not be disseminated” within the U.S. and that material shall be available “for examination only” to the media, academia, and Congress. In 1985, Senator Edward Zorinsky (D-NE) declared USIA would be no different than an organ of Soviet propaganda if its products were to be available domestically. The Act was amended to read: “no program material prepared by the United States Information Agency shall be distributed within the United States”.

Maybe I’m wrong in how I’m reading this excerpt, but my interpretation of this policy snapshot is that some degree of embarrassment existed among policy makers after WWII when they looked at the psychological warfare propaganda used in foreign theaters of war because, as the O.S.S. document shows, the targets considered by America’s war machine included pretty much EVERYONE involved, including allies and our own Armed Forces.

Since the end of WWII and the creation of the Central Intelligence Agency in 1947, much has been done to project the power of U.S. intelligence operations across the globe, especially once America launched a war that can’t be won, since the enemy defined by the WAR ON TERRORISM is a tactic and not a nation or foreign organization.

This war against a tactic was launched at the same time society-changing technology was rapidly emerging and connecting people, turning kinetic wars on actual geographical terrain into information wars for the ultimate prize: mind control through narrative control.

To undermine their narrative control, it helps to see behind the curtain, so let’s do just that by examining what’s publicly available (again, brought to you by the Decoding Culture Foundation) to contextualize the C.I.A.’s first tweet:

By becoming aware of how these operators have developed their information operations from the vantage point of the 2026 info-slop we’re all now drowning in, I’m hoping to make it easier to deflate the projected power of these assholes as little enablers, like Sean Evins, moves up the ladder to capitalize on his Public/Private government access by landing at a tech-company with a very weird name:

While Sean Evins enjoys global reach from KEK street, the inhabitants of MAIN street don’t seem to be doing all that well, especially the “conversation” happening right now between men, civil society, and a pack of rabid hyenas who risk spreading cognitive dissonance by even approaching how they see the world.

To see how sex and rape were viewed by the O.S.S., I have one final example left to share, and it will be followed by the comedic illumination of Shane Gillis and the insanity he’s baited the hyenas into exposing. Buckle up buttercup!

From O.S.S. movie ops to information technology seeded by the C.I.A., my Gen X brain really can’t take much more of this crap, which brings me and my over-loaded mind to the final words of the program on the verge of destroying the world in the 1983 movie War Games:

A STRANGE GAME.
THE ONLY WINNING MOVE IS
NOT TO PLAY.

Thanks for reading!

Donald Trump made a breaking news announcement last night in Kalispell that Montana will now be the official future home of a “Super Range” for weapons testing, and this all came about because Tim Sheehy obsessively lobbied Trump for this Department of War project.

Cool!

President Trump announced Wednesday that Montana would be the home of a new Defense Department “super range” to test advanced weapons and technology during a rally promoting Aaron Flint, who is running to represent the Big Sky state in the House.

“Montana will help ensure the American military always reigns supreme,” Mr. Trump told the crowd at the Majestic Valley Arena in Kalispell.

The president said the technologies tested would include “potential autonomous weapons, space and electronic warfare technology, supersonics and hypersonics.”

He joked that Sen. Tim Sheehy, Montana Republican, pestered him until Montana won the super range.

“You’re getting it, now leave me alone,” Mr. Trump told Mr. Sheehy.

While Tim Sheehy got his Super Range, Republicans got what THEY wanted, which was Daddy Trump telling them all the things they wanted to hear, like how they’ll keep their guns, get a $5,000 bribe if Republicans win, and they’ll keep winning wars, like the 48 minutes it took to kidnap the President of Venezuela.

SO MUCH WINNING!

Making it to the BIG TIME must be exciting, but it’s also not easy. You have to either ACTUALLY believe what the President says, or pretend to, and that must be tough, like when Trump says his administration is the best at protecting the 2nd amendment while obviously not mentioning the amazing use of lawfare to weaponize the civil protection-order framework so that a Veteran like Sam Redfern can be arrested for allegedly being in possession of one.

Is this how the Trump Administration plans on protecting the 2nd Amendement?

A prominent conservative commentator from Missoula was arrested Sunday night for allegedly violating a court order that prohibited him from possessing a firearm.

Samuel Pascal Redfern’s family and friends called his arrest a “false imprisonment” online, but a federal indictment alleged that Redfern had been restrained by a court from “harassing, stalking for threatening an intimate partner … “

Law enforcement arrested Redfern, the president of the Montana Veterans Association and a conservative commentator on social media, after a grand jury said he illegally possessed a firearm, according to documents filed in Missoula federal court.

I have lots of questions, like WHEN was this protection order put into place, and which court vetted the CIVIL claims from the “intimate partner”, and how long was the order in place for, but all those questions will have to wait for the LONG and EXPENSIVE process that makes lawfare so effective, since all it takes are accusations to start this process of ruining a person’s life.

In my hearing yesterday I finally got a date for the trial and that court date is December 11th. Because I turned down the plea offer I’m now waiting for the threat of a felony charge to materialize, since it’s being claimed that a reference in one of my Substack posts represents a technical violation of a protection order that should have NEVER been put into effect in the first place.

If the legal bullies who use the concept of “protection” and civil processes to destroy people want to maximize the pain, I’ll be arrested again on a Friday to ensure that I sit in jail for as long as possible before seeing a judge. Similarly, Sam Redfern was arrested on a Sunday and couldn’t see a judge until Tuesday, since Monday was a Federal holiday, and Brandon Bryant was arrested at the beginning of President’s Day weekend, which meant that he sat in jail for nearly FOUR whole days before seeing a judge.

For those who don’t understand how legal bullies operate, this is absolutely by design.

One of the biggest sins that earned me this legal targeting and neutralization campaign is exposing the Tax Increment Financing scam, which is being used to subsidize the company Trump mentioned last night, Janicki Industries. I guess a massive company like this can’t build an $800 million dollar facility outside Great Falls without the kind of local tax help that will ensure an entity similar to the Missoula Redevelopment Agency will now siphon off the largesse of this investment.

Here’s how tax-break whores open up their municipal legs for industry in competition with other jurisdictions that use similar enticements in the hopes pipe will be laid in their supple soils:

“What do we got to do to get you to come to Great Falls?” City Commissioner Rick Tryon said during a May 12 meeting.

The city commission approved its incentive, a tax break for new and expanding industries. It offers a 50% reduction in property taxes for five years. That reduction diminishes over the next five years, until the company pays the full amount by year 10 and beyond.

As part of the proposal, Janicki would be granted separate tax abatements for each of the four construction phases. The city has put in place occupancy guidelines to maintain eligibility for the tax benefits. The occupancy deadline for the first phase is May 31, 2029. The deadline for the fourth and final phase is May 31, 2035.

The city commission voted unanimously in favor, with Commissioner Shannon Wilson absent.

The Cascade County Board of Commissioners also met on May 12 and approved the same kind of tax incentive for its share of property taxes. The county also approved another tax break granted by state law on an estimated $2.7 million of industrial equipment. Both votes were unanimous in favor.

The total estimated tax benefit would reduce the company’s annual tax burden from $9.3 million to about $3.8 million. It would be one of the largest tax breaks given by the city and county, given the size and scope of the Janicki project.

Did offering all these tax breaks work? It must have, unless Rick Tryon did something else we don’t know about to win this massive investment for Great Falls.

It’s good to know that things Republicans don’t like get strategically ignored when Daddy Trump comes to town. Subsidize a business with deep pockets? Sure. Pretend lawfare isn’t used against conservatives by conservatives? Ok. And let’s not forget the family values of listening to Trump express how smitten he is with Sofie Cunningham.

“Don’t you like Sophie Cunningham, by the way? I think she’s great,” Trump said in Montana.

“I don’t know that much about women’s basketball. I don’t even know if she can play, I assume she can,” he added.

“She’s probably good, but there’s something about her that’s really great. I sort of like her. I must tell you. Sophie Cunningham, you know, she’s a big fan of ours, I hear.”

Alluding to her political beliefs, Trump added, “I don’t know if she’s any good at basketball, but she’s good at sanity. She’s good at bringing sanity to life.”

I’m glad Trump has someone who brings sanity to his life because, when I think of things like tax breaks and industrial investments, which I believe is more important than Sofie Cunningham’s “talent” playing basketball, I think about the serious problem of siphoning taxes from first responders as they deal with shit like this in open-air insane asylums called MISSOULA!

This stuff is a downer, so let’s focus on something more superficial, like how I said the word WHORE, which is apparently considered a cultural crime by humorless haters of comedic levity after Shane Gillis attempted the horrible offense of being FUNNY at the expense of, well, ATTENTION WHORES who don’t like it when reality is accurately described in a humorous manner.

Reality is simply amazing, so grab your guns (unless you’ve made a woman sad), fight for small government (unless you might get a check), and support businesses who don’t need handouts (unless another state is giving handouts), then enjoy those family values as the President describes his personal Sofie Cunningham mental health plan for sanity.

Actually, now that I think about, jail doesn’t sound so bad after all.

I have one more thing to note before I conclude my analysis of Trump’s Kalispell speech, and that’s how one of the loudest moments last night was also one of the quietest. Let me use a post from X to explain why:

When Governor Greg Gianforte was first referenced by Donald Trump last night, the audience’s response was noticeably very quiet, which is the most protest one can expect from Team MAGA a few weeks before the election. The reason, of course, is the H-1B Visa worries I put into my style of context in this post.

Silence is the best way to deal with potential triggers to cognitive dissonance, so I wish the best to Republicans as Montana continues on its path toward the utopia I’m sure awaits us with bio-medical industry enhancement’s to God’s defective creation and technological innovations for war that definitely won’t ever be used on U.S. citizens.

Tomorrow, if I’m not in jail, I’ll be writing about Boomers again, and the value of keeping your head down in a world dominated by cognitive dissonance, so stay tuned!

And, as always, thanks for reading.

Before last week I had never heard of Kirby Sommers, but an episode of The Higherside Chat introduced me to this “Epstein researcher” who seems more adamant about accusing OTHER RESEARCHERS of misdeeds than she is actually stopping the Epstein Network’s global power and influence, specifically Whitney Webb, Johnny Vedmore, and the publisher I wrote about in May, Kris Millegan, who runs TrineDay Press.

With my own research into the Epstein Network, and an interview I did last month with Johnny Vedmore, I won’t claim NOT to be biased with my opinion of a woman who boasted about her relationship with a married billionaire before rebranding this relationship as an example of sexual slavery, with Kirby being, of course, being the innocent victim.

Ok, so does THIS sound like an innocent sex-slave victim?

When getting clicks is more important than vetting “researchers” like Kirby Sommers, REAL researchers, like Johnny Vedmore, pay the price, especially when they become the targets of a woman like “Kirby” who sold real estate in New York, made money off Hurricane Katrina survivors, and changed her name as part of her rebranding process.

None of these red flags were enough to stop Greg Carlwood from platforming this woman on the internet, which was created BY white men FOR white men, obviously.

If you didn’t know these facts about the internet, a University of Montana alum, Rebecca Solnit, has a new piece up at The Nation about mis-adventuring across the MANOSPHERE that I’m sure will be enlightening.

By gendering the creation of the internet and focusing on the MANOSPHERE slice of online culture, paid culture-agitators, like Solnit, get to ignore how TOTALLY INSANE social media has made many women–unless you consider identifying with a baby killer and throwing ice cubes in your bathroom to be normal female behavior.

Since I have court today and am anticipating a felony criminal charge for JUST SAYING NO to a shitty plea deal, I’m going to wrap up today’s post with an example of how fucked the truth is, and the reason the truth is officially fucked is because of this TERRIBLE idea, as reported by WIRED:

Would you put money on whether Covid-19 originated from a lab? How about whether some of the footage from the Apollo 11 moon landing was actually filmed on Earth?

Verifact Markets, a new startup that bills itself as a “prediction market for disputed facts,” is betting that people will be eager to weigh in on questions like these. The company’s premise is so quirky it sounds like something a couple of philosophy and economics majors dreamed after too many bong rips in their dorm room: Instead of wagering on the future, why not trade on stuff that already happened?

Not only is this gambling-on-the-past idea a TERRIBLE idea, it’s part of the gamification of everything, which is having a particularly destructive impact on men. Here’s a little more about this terrible idea:

When Verifact Markets launched on Friday, some of the initial topics traders could take a position on included whether Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide and whether insurance behemoth State Farm “intentionally delayed” claims related to the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires. The featured market during beta testing was, indeed, about the origins of Covid-19. (As of writing, the market is still open, with “true” priced at 76 cents and “false” at 32; the majority of participants had put money on the pandemic beginning at Wuhan Institute of Virology.)

Ok, I’m done. And from the looks of it, so is society.

Thanks for reading!