
Yesterday, at a Congressional hearing on Missing and Murdered Indigenous People (MMIP), Montana’s Attorney General, Austin Knudsen, took the national stage for an opportunity to promote his leadership for his eventual run for Governor, which we all know is coming.
To bolster his leadership credentials, Knudsen claimed that authorities in Montana have found 99% of the people who went missing last year. If true, that’s an impressive number. Also, according to the official transcripts, Knudsen indicated how many missing people in Montana are NOT women.
I’ll start, today, by providing you with some statistics that helped me get a clear picture of the problem when I was first briefed on the issue as Attorney General. Some of what I say might surprise you. It was a surprise to me.
It’s a common misconception that only women are going missing. In 2025, 48 percent of all people reported missing in Montana were male and 52 percent were female. In the Indigenous community, the data starts to skew, but there is still a large percentage of males that are reported missing. Last year, 40 percent of the Indigenous persons that went missing were males. Our current messaging that it’s only a problem for women
Today, after trying to use the searchable Montana database of Missing Persons, I’m going to add a little context to how problematic Knudsen’s speech was, since he admitted something VERY important yesterday, which is this:
As Attorney General, my hands are tied. I have no jurisdiction on tribal land. The Montana Legislature can pass all the bills they want, but without action from Congress, we will never see meaningful change. You have the power to give tribes the authority they need by removing unnecessary and confusing jurisdictional red tape. You can also give states some authority to help.
If Austin Knudsen would like to make an improvement with how Montana provides information on missing people, then making the missing persons database actually functional is a good place to start. Instead, when I put in the name of someone who I know is on the list, Monte Swanson, this was the result:

In order to actually find Monte Swanson’s entry, I had to manually scroll through the list of 169 names until I came across it.

Last September, as reported by the New York Post, my conversation with Boston 25 news put Monte Swanson’s name out there again in connection to his potential killer, Kevin Lino, who caught new murder charges last fall in Massachusetts:
“I believe he is a very dangerous, dangerous individual. So, I think he is a serial killer for sure,” said Montana journalist Travis Mateer, who spent time with Lino as a homeless counselor in Missoula.
Mateer believes Lino is even responsible for the vanishing of another homeless man, Monte Swanson, who knew Lino in Missoula.
And prosecutors are also open to the idea that Lino might have more deaths on his hands.
“We continue to investigate that,” said Ryan. “We never give up on those cases. We don’t forget about them, and we stay open to other information.”
(note: I was the Homeless Outreach Coordinator, not a “counselor”, and my interactions with Lino’s gang was minimal)
Another case I’m familiar with–the disappearance of Heather Tifft in Hot Springs, Montana–is likely connected to drugs, so if anyone knows anything, they aren’t talking to local authorities.


Another case I think involves drugs is assumed to be a case of the “boyfriend did it”, at least that’s the impression left by Detective Guy Baker, who retired from being a Detective last year after failing to locate Jermaine Charlo.

Despite Baker’s failure, that didn’t stop him from going on TV to keep feeding the hope he’s got something brewing to break this case. We’re waiting, Guy.
After investigators concluded that all the evidence seemed to point toward DeFrance, police met with the county prosecutor, who promised to take a hard look at the case.
At the episode’s end, Baker told Charlo’s family that he was “very confident” they’d get the resolution they hoped for in the “very near future.”
I know Baker has his heart set on blaming DeFrance, but if he had put together a stronger case, maybe prosecutors would have charged him, but Baker’s case was apparently NOT strong enough for those charges, so perhaps his theory is WRONG and Jermaine Charlo saw something related to a big drug deal that put her at risk.
At least, that’s what one of MY sources is telling me.
Two years ago I published a text exchange I had with Guy Baker around the same time I was hearing about Heather Tifft’s disappearance for the first time from a woman who was later shot in the stomach by her brother (yes, drugs were involved). Because of this context, seeing Guy Baker in the courtroom last May was a bit unnerving, but that didn’t stop me from calling him to the stand as a witness in my hearing and having the judge put him under oath so we could have a little “honest” chat about his new career as a Private Investigator investigating ME.


I don’t know what kind of advice, or recommendations, someone in Guy Baker’s position would give a supposedly “reasonable” individual who is allegedly so afraid of claimed conduct that an order of protection is necessary, but from my perspective (which is admittedly biased in this case), I would assume a Private Investigator would tell his terrified client to NOT go to a location where said person claimed he would be to raise money for the cost of court transcripts.

It’s been 3 months since I was arrested in the parking lot of the Great Burn Brewery on an arrest warrant and, for some weird reason, Deputy County Attorney, Mac Bloom, is REFUSING to produce the 911 call from that day, which puts me in a weird state of deja vu regarding the case of Rebekah Barsotti and the difficulty Rebekah’s mother had simply obtaining the 911 call from the “Oregon family” who saw folded up clothes and personal belongings on the side of the river and said themselves “Hey, let’s call those really competent law men in MINERAL COUNTY to come and investigate!” (not an actual quote)
The final missing person case I’d like to highlight involves a wife who may have come to Mineral County from the state of Washington with her husband, Earl, who, you know, tried REALLY HARD to find her before reporting her missing 9 days later.


The competency of our Sheriffs in western Montana is a BIG concern to me, and one I plan to keep reporting on. For example, under the leadership of Missoula’s previous Sheriff, T.J. McDermott, his deputies struggled to do basic math when Todd Keith Spence assaulted TWO workers for the Department of Transportation, but only caught ONE assault charge.
I’m pretty sure 1+1 is supposed to equal 2, but I majored in English at UM, so maybe I’m wrong.
In Mineral County the competency of the Sheriff, Ryan Funke, his lawyer, Lance Jasper, and resigned Commissioner, Shawn Smalley, is getting some local media attention, with more sure to come:
A Mineral County Board of Commissioners meeting became heated last week after the county sheriff refused to turn over requested documents for a purchase he made in 2025.
County Attorney Debra Jackson aired her frustrations with Sheriff Ryan Funke at the Sept. 10 meeting after he allegedly refused to complete a records request she sent him more than a month ago.
The request is part of an investigation into missing patrol vehicles Funke ordered in 2025. The sheriff ordered six vehicles from ESU Pursuits, a Kansas-based government vehicle supplier, for $353,688, according to a figure he provided at a board meeting on May 15, 2025. The delivery remains unfulfilled, according to county officials.
And finally, my most recent clue that Missoula’s Sheriff, Jeremiah Petersen, lacks basic skills, like using computers, arose with my simultaneous alarm that Judge Vanatta doesn’t understand the Constitution because, according to the sworn testimony of a public official, my updated address information wasn’t accessible to review for our County’s top Law Man.

Worried about our Sheriff’s computer skills, I immediately consulted the Sheriff’s civil branch, and they confirmed I’ve been served AT MY address because they do indeed, HAVE MY address in their computer system.
Hmmm…could the person making this claim have been LYING?
It’s sad to see someone struggle so hard with reality, but if readers want to experience reality with ME, I’ll be publicly sharing my 4-plex address for 24 hours, starting tomorrow, so you know where to come on Saturday to help me celebrate my birthday (and give me birthday money!).
I may even do a dramatic reading of my court transcripts, which my Daddy ended up paying for.
So, stay tuned, and thanks for reading!
































