Mainstream Reports Reflect Growing Skepticism Over Experimental Health Interventions

by Travis Mateer

Yesterday I saw an article at NBC Montana that surprised me. A Missoula researcher, said the headline, is going to present info on potential COVID-19 treatment to county officials. Here’s what retired doctor Walter Peschel is claiming from the link:

Retired Missoula family physician Walter Peschel has been studying a combination of oral anti-inflammatory and statin medicines for decades, including how they may significantly reduce the symptoms of diabetes, and now says they can do the same for COVID-19.

“These four drugs have been approved for more than 40 years,” Peschel said. “They’ve been found to be safe and they’ve been found to be affective; each for their own individual use that they were tested for. I am just trying to repurpose their use.”

He says COVID-19 patients’ inflammation readings are off the charts, and not caused by the virus itself, but done so indirectly, through a hyperactive immune response.

Used together, Dr. Peschel says these already widely used medicines can increase their power in leveling the immune response.

If there are actual NON-VACCINE treatments for Covid-19, as this doctor is claiming, what could that mean for mandate-obsessed cheerleaders for Big Pharma? Will the entire EMERGENCY USE authorization be called into question, since it was predicated on the claim no effective treatment for this new illness existed?

Other realities about the experimental vaccines are beginning to seep into legacy media stories, like this Bloomberg piece, which begins like this:

Anecdotes tell us what the data can’t: Vaccinated people appear to be getting the coronavirus at a surprisingly high rate. But exactly how often isn’t clear, nor is it certain how likely they are to spread the virus to others.

Though it is evident vaccination still provides powerful protection against the virus, there’s growing concern that vaccinated people may be more vulnerable to serious illness than previously thought.

Across the pond, the BBC is openly pondering the emerging reliance on boosters for the vaccinated, writing this:

It is now a serious question that has implications for whether children should ever be vaccinated. And whether we use the virus or booster shots to top up immunity in adults. Both have become contentious issues.

“We could be digging ourselves into a hole, for a very long time, where we think we can only keep Covid away by boosting every year,” Prof Eleanor Riley, an immunologist from the University of Edinburgh, told me.

While these valid concerns get some mainstream attention (while skeptics like me have been aware of these issues for months), the FDA is busy putting its stamp of approval on Big Pharma’s new “health” technology.

Once upon a time activists on the left side of the political spectrum understood that regulatory capture could be spelled like this: F A S C I S M.

Now I’m just hoping mainstream news reports like the ones highlighted above might help break the cult-like spell of scientism deranging their cognitive abilities.

Only time will tell.

Thanks for reading.