Before last week I had never heard of Kirby Sommers, but an episode of The Higherside Chat introduced me to this “Epstein researcher” who seems more adamant about accusing OTHER RESEARCHERS of misdeeds than she is actually stopping the Epstein Network’s global power and influence, specifically Whitney Webb, Johnny Vedmore, and the publisher I wrote about in May, Kris Millegan, who runs TrineDay Press.
With my own research into the Epstein Network, and an interview I did last month with Johnny Vedmore, I won’t claim NOT to be biased with my opinion of a woman who boasted about her relationship with a married billionaire before rebranding this relationship as an example of sexual slavery, with Kirby being, of course, being the innocent victim.
Ok, so does THIS sound like an innocent sex-slave victim?
When getting clicks is more important than vetting “researchers” like Kirby Sommers, REAL researchers, like Johnny Vedmore, pay the price, especially when they become the targets of a woman like “Kirby” who sold real estate in New York, made money off Hurricane Katrina survivors, and changed her name as part of her rebranding process.
None of these red flags were enough to stop Greg Carlwood from platforming this woman on the internet, which was created BY white men FOR white men, obviously.
If you didn’t know these facts about the internet, a University of Montana alum, Rebecca Solnit, has a new piece up at The Nation about mis-adventuring across the MANOSPHERE that I’m sure will be enlightening.
By gendering the creation of the internet and focusing on the MANOSPHERE slice of online culture, paid culture-agitators, like Solnit, get to ignore how TOTALLY INSANE social media has made many women–unless you consider identifying with a baby killer and throwing ice cubes in your bathroom to be normal female behavior.
Since I have court today and am anticipating a felony criminal charge for JUST SAYING NO to a shitty plea deal, I’m going to wrap up today’s post with an example of how fucked the truth is, and the reason the truth is officially fucked is because of this TERRIBLE idea, as reported by WIRED:
Would you put money on whether Covid-19 originated from a lab? How about whether some of the footage from the Apollo 11 moon landing was actually filmed on Earth?
Verifact Markets, a new startup that bills itself as a “prediction market for disputed facts,” is betting that people will be eager to weigh in on questions like these. The company’s premise is so quirky it sounds like something a couple of philosophy and economics majors dreamed after too many bong rips in their dorm room: Instead of wagering on the future, why not trade on stuff that already happened?
Not only is this gambling-on-the-past idea a TERRIBLE idea, it’s part of the gamification of everything, which is having a particularly destructive impact on men. Here’s a little more about this terrible idea:
When Verifact Markets launched on Friday, some of the initial topics traders could take a position on included whether Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide and whether insurance behemoth State Farm “intentionally delayed” claims related to the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires. The featured market during beta testing was, indeed, about the origins of Covid-19. (As of writing, the market is still open, with “true” priced at 76 cents and “false” at 32; the majority of participants had put money on the pandemic beginning at Wuhan Institute of Virology.)
Ok, I’m done. And from the looks of it, so is society.
Thanks for reading!
God be with you today, my friend.