When the Gemstone children are freed from captivity their return to the stage is triumphant. Because of their courage? No, because they can finally claim a genuine victim narrative in order to exploit it like they’ve been taught to exploit Christianity by their Daddy, played by John Goodman.
Am I good man? Or am I villain, like Ye has declared himself to be? Maybe I’m a dick-less scumbag who needs to off himself, at least that’s how a grief-stricken boyfriend is approaching my coverage of his dead girl friend and the odd comment that post received from Detective Guy Baker.
I suggest the sad boyfriend, the Detective Guy, and ANYONE interested in online behavior check out this article regarding the FBI’s new focus on “764” networks of predation targeting minors. Here’s an excerpt:
The FBI has been investigating at least 250 subjects allegedly tied to violent online networks that prey on minors.
The networks, under investigation by all of the FBI’s 55 field offices, are known as “764” but have other names.
“The FBI is growing increasingly concerned about a loose network of violent predators who befriend minors and other vulnerable individuals through popular online platforms and then coerce them into escalating sexual and violent behavior,“ the FBI said in a May 8 statement to The Epoch Times, noting this includes ”pushing victims to create graphic content, child sexual abuse material (CSAM), harm family pets, cut themselves with sharp objects, or attempt suicide.”
“Some of these predators even watch live-streamed self-harm and other violent content.”
In a situation like the one described above, it’s pretty clear who the victims and villains are, but sometimes it’s less clear, like the following story about a couple involved in a violent domestic situation where one of the intimate partners shot the other one after THAT intimate partner put their two year old child down.
I purposefully kept the gender roles of who the shooter was and who got shot vague because I suspect, if it was what you would assume, and the shooter was the man, he would obviously spend quite some time in prison, even if the spouse survived. But what if the shooter was a woman?
A Hamilton woman who pleaded guilty to attempted deliberate homicide and criminal endangerment who was previously sentenced to 50 years at DPHHS in March of this year, has been released on probation.
Montana Jane Wisniewski Getz pleaded guilty to shooting her husband multiple times at their home in Hamilton in February of 2024.
According to court documents, on March 25, 2025 Getz was sentenced to the custody of the Department of Public Health and Human Services for a period of 40 years for the charge of attempted deliberate homicide; she received credit for 416 days served in the Ravalli Co. Detention Center. She was also sentenced to another 10 years on the charge of criminal endangerment, running consecutively, totaling 50 years to DPHHS.
What a heart-warming story for the day after Mother’s Day! I mean, this considerate mother waited until AFTER the father of her child put the kid down before shooting him multiple times, forcing him to jump out their second story window.
Having spent time in jail myself recently, I don’t think it’s a great place to put ANYONE, but are we prioritizing THIS person’s mental health needs in a manner that would be consistent in similar cases, but with different genitalia? Because it sounds like, without medication and intensive therapy, Ravalli County just put a potentially dangerous person on the streets (emphasis mine):
“The reasons for the sentence imposed are the Court has received and reviewed the pre-sentence investigation report and has heard the recommendations of counsel. The sentence is consistent with the permanently damaging actions she took in this case, is reasonably related to the crime, and promotes the interests of justice and public safety and provides an opportunity for the Defendant to rehabilitate herself within the community. As expressed at the initial March sentencing, the Court is profoundly concerned that if the Defendant does not diligently attend to her mental health needs, she does present a danger to herself and others. If all her actions which led to the charges in this case can be explained by unattended to mental illness, and if the Defendant stops her medication and therapy regime, she has the capacity to make both rational and irrational decisions, inflict great harm and also has the cognitive wherewithal to fabricate a story to deflect blame away from her,“ according to court documents.
Cool! Let’s hope Jane doesn’t go off her meds.
As I drove downtown this morning to one of my blog writing spots I saw a woman almost get mowed down while crossing the street by the courthouse. The white car barely missed her, then parked the wrong direction in front of the pawn shop. I saw this play out, parked my own car, and watched as the female driver of the car got out, walked to the pawnshop, picked up a box of junk left outside the closed front door, then got back in her car and sped off, almost hitting a car in the on-coming traffic lane as she drove away. Here’s a pic:
If she hits and kills someone later today, or tomorrow, I’m sure there’s a mental health diagnosis that will allow a framework of victimhood to be placed over her journey through the criminal justice system. Would that framework serve to BETTER our community or, perhaps, make it a less safe for us to live?
Don’t worry. Until I actually chop my dick off, you can just dismiss my rantings as that of a white cis-male, or some shit like that.
Thanks for reading!
