This episode of Week in Review begins with a solo breakdown of the first two posts of the week, then I’m joined by Allie Harrison to get us through to the end. I had teased a discussion on the latest in Rebekah Barsotti’s case, but that conversation will require more time and energy than I had after 90 minutes of talking.
If you appreciate five posts a week, with a podcast episode every Sunday to expand on the week’s coverage, then please consider making a donation at my about page.
That’s right, so much is going on that I decided a bonus post was in order. Why? Because HOUSING is a crisis and we MUST DO everything we can in Zoom Town to create MORE and DENSER housing everywhere possible. This is where the housing zealotry of Danny Tenenbaum comes into play. Danny is a former legislator who was one of the loudest supporters of developing Larchmont golf course because housing is such a BIG issue for him, it’s prominently displayed on his Twitter bio:
Since Danny Tenenbaum is PROBABLY THINKING ABOUT HOUSING I probably didn’t need to bring his attention to the worry being expressed over the plan to conserve over 20 acres of prime land in the Rattlesnake area (his hood), but I did anyway.
From the link:
Ward 3 Councilor Gwen Jones worried about the tradeoff from putting a conservation easement on otherwise developable land. She pointed out the Ten Spoon property is flat, close to residential neighborhoods and connected to city utilities, positioning the area for potential housing development in the future. A conservation easement would eliminate that option.
“It’s really a competing values type scenario,” Jones noted Wednesday. “I guess my concern is just the city being part of the equation and not ever having any development on that land.”
I was surprised to be NOT angry at something coming out of Gwen Jones’ mouth, so I’ll commend Jones for bringing up the competition of values on display here exposing WHERE the Missoula elitists want density, which is anywhere but their own backyard, obviously. This is clear NIMBYism, plain and simple.
The pushback to Jones’ common-sense concern came from Missoula’s most dangerous financial terrorist, Parks and Rec director, Donna Gaukler. Here she is:
But Parks and Recreation Director Donna Gaukler pointed out: “Individual property owners still do have individual property rights to choose to do with their property as they wish.”
Gaukler said the benefit of the project would be the preservation of agricultural land, something she believes the city hasn’t been very successful at achieving on its own. She called the Ten Spoon effort “heroic.”
Heroic? Are you fucking kidding, Gaukler? Maybe these winery snobs have been watching too much Yellowstone, since the patriarch of the show (Kevin Costner’s character) uses this strategy to save his ranch from future development.
Missoula is a stark microcosm of what’s coming: density for the urban core, where the poors can have their WORKFORCE housing, while elite enclaves like the Rattlesnake will be preserved in order to insulate wealthy complainers from the consequences of gentrification.
There is one kind of development I think Rattlesnake residents might want to consider, and that’s fencing. Why? Because America will continue to descend into chaos, so taking precautions is just the smart thing to do. To help get the brainstorming going, here is a free concept using plastic bricks:
If you appreciate this content, please consider making a financial donation at my about page.
Thanks for reading, and stay tuned for the WEEK IN REVIEW this Sunday!
Despite the infuriating image of Secretary of Transportation, Pete Buttigieg, this post isn’t about the growing alarm over the derailment disaster in East Palestine, Ohio. Nope, it’s about the train OBSESSION our County Commissioner, Dave Strohmaier, has developed regarding his dream of seeing passenger rail return to the region.
Four days after the derailment, all three Commissioners discussed Dave’s update for the Big Sky Passenger Rail Authority. First Dave gives us some histrionics, explaining how Amtrak ended passenger rail through Missoula in 1979.
Now, all these years later, Commissioner Dave has realized a mechanism exists that allows Missoula County to form a new governmental entity, so that’s what they did with the Big Sky Passenger Rail Authority. Here’s one of my favorite (and most terrifying) quotes from Dave Strohmaier as he kicks his exuberance for passenger rail into high gear:
“…the law is written so broadly that we could actually be a railroad if we wanted to be…that is not what we’re about, I’m not going to be wearing a conductors hat on the train anytime soon, but WE COULD!”
Is Dave Strohmaier threatening us? Because it kinda sounds like he is. Then, later in the podcast episode, Dave talks about WHY they spent time and resources during the pandemic on creating this new authority. You see, Dave had a hunch that a BIG infrastructure bill would be coming and…he was RIGHT!
Dave is also very excited that a Federal study is being conducted for 15 million dollars that will determine just what routes could be revived. Dave is expecting this study to be done by November of 2023 and said explicitly that “…our goal is to do everything humanly possible in the next 10 months to make sure that this route is at the top of the heap for recommended routes…” When fellow Commissioner, Josh Slotnick, asked HOW this would be done, Dave sort of chuckles proudly and says:
Well, it helped that we had a hand in writing the criteria by which these routes would be reviewed!
After Dave makes this statement, all three Commissioners give rich belly-laughs. It’s chilling.
Beyond the Federal money, Dave is also shaking down the Montana Healthcare Foundation for money to do “tribal and rural stakeholder engagement across Montana”. Why would a healthcare foundation want to partner with a train authority, Dave asks? Because transportation is a huge factor in “social determinants for health”.
Things get a little awkward when the tribes–and the history of trains disappearing their roaming, tribal presence across the west–is touched on. “A vector for a lot of negativity,” says Commissioner Slotnick. Dave then points out the irony that tribes across Montana are some of the biggest partners to the Big Sky Passenger Rail.
How many routes are being considered, Commissioner Vero asks? In our region, just two primary routes are being considered, says Dave. The one Dave hopes will get the Federal Lazarus treatment is the Northcoast Hiawatha route, which once extended from Chicago to Seattle. The other route is the Pioneer Route, which extends from Cheyenne to Denver, Salt Lake City, then to Portland. That route was discontinued in the 1990s.
While Dave Strohmaier is in Denver doing his train thing, he is going to also examine the route that went from Denver to Billings and champion the madness of ideas like connecting El Paso, Texas all the way up to Calgary, in Canada. Dave points out how few North/South rail lines exist, so he’s dreaming BIG!
“Dave, you should be more ambitious,” Josh Slotnick jokes. Dave’s response?
“I figure if we can fly a helicopter on Mars, we can figure out how to run trains on planet earth here!”
At this point Commissioner Slotnick starts pivoting to climate change, so I take a look at the time and it’s only HALF DONE! I don’t think 15 minutes of a podcast has ever felt so long.
After a much needed break I returned for more nuggets of insight into why this passenger rail pipe dream should be a priority for a Missoula County Commissioner, and Dave gave me three “clusters” of benefits. The first is “economic development”. For Missoula, Dave envisions enhancing the vibrancy of downtown. Dave claims the economic benefit for the states this route runs through will be around $270 million dollars.
The second cluster is “transportation equity” and the third is environmental/sustainability benefits because, in this case, diesel engines are ok, says Dave, but it’s also possible to electrify rail because it was done 100 years ago.
Another question that came up is freight routes, and whether there would be conflict. Those train interests are at the table, Dave says, because they’re on the board! And if there’s more “double-tracking” happening, instead of single-track, then trains can pass each other. I think it’s hilarious that this politician who stood on a bridge that will get its car lanes reduced is all gung-ho for laying more train tracks across the country.
Commissioner Josh then asks a “political question” about this “moment for rail” because, says Josh, we have “Amtrak Joe, being leader of the free world, and Mayor Pete, the secretary of transportation…to what degree is all this success vulnerable to a switch in administrations?”
As part of Dave’s response, he points to the red hue of some of the counties in Montana signing on to the Big Sky Passenger Rail Authority. Dave even claims Mitt Romney is down for trains! So totally bipartisan and, Dave hopes, insulated from the fickle winds of political change.
If you think this is totally cool, and you want to help, you can give your time FOR FREE to the passenger rail authority! But the 30 minutes I spent listening to Dave Strohmaier? Sadly, I’ll never get that time back.
If you appreciate the monumental effort it takes to listen to Dave’s love of trains (which goes back 16 years, according to Commissioner Vero) then consider making a financial donation at my about page.
Two pieces of news caught my attention regarding actions being requested to make some people FEEL safer. Will they actually BE safer? I don’t know, but I could probably develop a suitable answer for a hefty consulting fee.
Some testimony apparently happened this week up in Helena because the Multi-Modal Zealots (MMZs) would like to expand the police state to make them safer from motorists running red lights. I wonder if any of these supporters every criticized giving MORE money to law enforcement during the summer of rage? I dunno, but I doubt this effort will go anywhere.
This is happening because MMZs like to turn tragedy into opportunity, and THIS is the tragedy inspiring this current opportunity for…red light cameras!
If you run a red light in Montana, you won’t get a citation unless an officer sees you. That’s because red light traffic cameras have been outlawed statewide since 2009, when the state Legislature passed House Bill 531.
Now, that camera conversation is being reignited following the death of a beloved Montana teacher. Forty-year-old Billings native, Kelly Fulton, was hit and killed in October, 2022, while riding his bike to school, where he worked as a math teacher at Bozeman High School.
The article goes on to deploy some heavy emotional manipulation about how this man’s kids were saved by banana muffins (necessitating a car ride to school instead of the fatal bicycle ride) and maybe, JUST MAYBE, a future father’s life will be saved by what these grieving people “believe” will be a deterrent (emphasis mine):
Muffins may have saved two lives this time, but the family hopes to save more by shedding light on state legislation that bans the use of red-light cameras in Montana. It’s technology they believe would deter drivers from running red lights.
Yes, it should be obvious by now that simply BELIEVING something will make you safer is a good enough reason to impose your preferred method of being safer onto others.
The other story involves emails that are required to be sent out by Universities informing staff and students of sexual assaults, but those emails can be very scary and triggering, so obviously they require their OWN WARNINGS. Recently an email was sent out WITHOUT that warning, and that was a mistake. From the link (emphasis mine):
The Clery Act requires universities to send out timely warnings to students if there are any crimes that “are considered to have a serious and ongoing threat” to the broader campus.
“I was in class and I got a notification on my phone of Clery Act’s timely warning, and it was very activating for me because sexual assaults were in the title of the email.” Heaton said, “And I didn’t even have to read the body of the email to be like ‘whoa.’ And then it was kind of on my mind, sort of distracted from education a little bit because it was in class.”
The bill text cited eight Clery Act timely warnings since September 2021 regarding physical and/or sexual violence Only two of them had content warnings. UMPD Chief Brad Giffin said it is protocol to include content warnings, and omissions in recent emails have been by mistake.
There was one brave ASUM Senator willing to point out that warning emails are sort of worry-inducing by design. In fact, it’s kind of like their main function.
Senator Adrian Cook said that the point of the Clery Act and the timely warnings email is to, to an extent, worry the student body about the crimes by informing them about them. Clery Act emails always ask for students to send tips about the crime in question, according to UMPD’s website.
Hang in there, MMZs and UM students, help is on the way!
If you appreciate this content, please consider making a donation at my about page.
There is a young girl in Missoula who will probably be VERY hesitant to ride a Mountain Line bus ever again after the creep pictured below allegedly exposed himself to her last week. Now Jack Mellem is facing several felony charges, as you can see from his booking information.
The hypothetical question I have after reading the article about Mellem’s alleged sex crime is whether or not he would have been riding the bus in the first place if it meant spending some of his own money on the service. Here is how Mountain Line promotes their “Zero-Fare” service at their website. From the link:
Sounds great, right? Well, since our city leaders have a pathological need to downplay the reality of an increasing number of drug-addicted, mentally unstable people roaming around, the 1.5 MILLION RIDES number feels like a data-point smokescreen being deployed to hide any possible negative side-effects of Zero-Fare from emerging, because that might lead to questions from the public that our city leaders don’t want to answer.
I was still working at the homeless shelter in 2015 when the bus service became free, so I have a pretty unique perspective on how that shift impacted MY ability to work with people on the streets. One of the few things of value I had to incentivize goal-oriented behavior from the clientele I was trying to help were the free “day passes” that could be used for one whole day.
Since riding the bus used to cost actual money, these passes not only had monetary value, they also had leverage value, because they were dispersed by my program based on criteria that increased the chances that the service would be used by clients appropriately and constructively. I even had some difficult conversations about body odor because, believe me, that can be a SERIOUS deterrent to the non-sanitation-challenged individuals who want, or need, to use the bus service.
Maybe the reason MORE riders are desired is because it gets Mountain Line more grant money. That seems to be at least one result of increasing the number of people using the bus system, according to this article from 2019. From the link (emphasis mine):
Thanks to receiving two highly competitive federal grants, the Mountain Line bus service will soon be adding six new electric buses to its fleet,
Community Outreach Coordinator for Mountain Bill Pfeiffer said the new buses will be arriving this summer.
“We were able to get the grants thanks to the large increase in ridership we received thanks to the Zero Fare program,” said Pfeiffer. “We’re just really excited to be helping to improve Missoula’s air quality as we know that can be an issue in Missoula.
New electric buses means cleaner air, and more buses means less cars. So what if a tween has to endure a pervert showing her his junk every now and then, the price of saving of the planet is clearly worth it.
That’s sarcasm, by the way.
If you appreciate my multi-modal criticism, then consider making a financial donation at my about page.
