Is Missoula As Vindictive As It Appears To Be To My Biased Eye?

by Travis Mateer

I’ll be the first one to admit my perspective contains biases. Some of these biases have been acquired through experience, like my insider perspective on the homeless issue and the Engen regime, and my experience with political retaliation. From these experiences I feel comfortable making the following assertion: power in Missoula is exerted in subtle, petty and VERY vindictive ways.

Let me provide an example.

But first, I’d like to thank the RD readers sending me insightful emails. I am crazy-busy with multiple projects, so it’s hard to keep up with the schemers of Zoom Town. I greatly appreciate the insights, and have multiple posts for the coming week bouncing around my head already.

This post is one that I almost didn’t write even though the headline is something I should have jumped on immediately: Missoula pushes toward first usage of Affordable Housing Trust Fund money.

Here is the key thing to focus on from this article: WHO got the money and WHO got denied.

I’ll make it simple for RD readers. Susan Hay Patrick’s United Way of Missoula got the money, and Heather Harp’s Habitat for Humanity did not.

Here’s the framing of the loot for Susan:

A $26,250 project with United Way is likely to be the first use of the money, which can be allocated as a grant or a loan. It passed 9-0 with one abstaining vote and moves to a public hearing, which will take place during a city council meeting on Nov. 8.

The United Way project is called the Centralized Housing Solution Fund, which “is a flexible financial assistance fund intended to divert households from the houselessness system in Missoula. It is available for households who identify it as a need for resolving their housing crisis through diversion or rapid exit conversations,” according to city documents. Projects were asked to be “innovative” in addition to other criteria.

Sounds all nice and dandy, right? What could be amiss? Well, you start getting a little peek when Heather Harp’s questions are introduced, but in a way that only close readers who know recent municipal history will pick up on.

Only 10% of the available trust fund dollars were allocated, which councilor Heather Harp questioned.

“We wanted to ultimately wait and encourage applicants to come back to the unified round, because it is right around the corner and we have an opportunity to provide feedback to applicants who did apply and also do some outreach and work with other community partners to encourage more applications,” Armstrong told the committee.

The unified round Armstrong mentions is the next round of trust fund grants and loans, which will happen in winter of 2022.

That’s right, only 10% of the money was allocated as YWCA families face eviction as the weather turns, and Emily Armstrong thinks that an entire year to wait is RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER.

How much money is being left on the table? $273,750 dollars, that’s how much. I guess Heather Harp’s application was pretty shitty.

Or maybe this joke of a committee won’t be allocating money to Heather Harp because she’s still being punished for acting like a human being to the TIF activists, something Brandon Bryant recently discussed in my interview with him.

The article gets even more frustrating as Homeword director, Andrea Davis, describes her difficulties and concerns regarding the application process:

Andrea Davis, the executive director of Homeword, spoke to council during a public comment session regarding one of the projects that was not funded–a Habitat for Humanity project with which Homeword was assisting.

Davis said she has tried to register with Engage Missoula, the city’s website for projects going on in the community, five times and expressed concern Missoula was using that as its registration portal. She said the issue was never addressed.

Davis also said those involved with the Habitat for Humanity project received a notice that gave reasons for the application being denied, but did not see the rubric or how their project compared with others that were proposed for money from the trust fund.

The project they proposed was finding placement for five modular homes–sites for two of the five had been secured and identified–and Davis said one of the reasons given as to why their project was declined was because three other areas for those homes had not been identified.

“Two of the homes could have been placed immediately and there’s nothing that stops the staff or the selection committee from suggesting a partial funding of an application,” Davis said.

I’m sure there’s an objective, non-vindictive rationale for why Susan Hay Patrick’s non-profit always gets money while other non-profits get a caring middle-finger, but my biased eye can’t see it.

All I see are vindictive Engen enablers with long memories reminding people like Heather Harp who controls the purse strings.

Prove me wrong, Missoula.

About Travis Mateer

I'm an artist and citizen journalist living and writing in Montana. You can contact me here: willskink at yahoo dot com
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Is Missoula As Vindictive As It Appears To Be To My Biased Eye?

  1. John Ulrigg says:

    Guess what the board of directors Mike Nugent son of Jim Nugent the 50-year City attorney

    This is the man who wrote TIF district legislation and presented it to the legislator in the early 70s

    And knowing his past history with being quite okay with stealing from impoverished people
    Even after the department of Justice told him not to he kept going for five years until someone filed a lawsuit to get their $25 back

    Try to tell me they don’t look at the court system or people in legal limbo is a source of income you’ve seen my post where they constantly side people for being house was in our town that’s a source of income

    Susan a Patrick’s another one who was alerted to my abuse is at the hands of Michael Moore’s article which Michael Moore then became a worker at the United Way and I confronted him and asked him why he was so willing to throw me under the bus in the court of public opinion and then do no follow-up as we all know they never showed that I was acquitted of two counts of felony assault on a police officer keep an eye out of the paper kept the lawyers away from me and then made it quite acceptable for future police abuse which is going on for 15 to 16 years

    And when I complain enough to be involved in the discipline process I’m told that amount is right to privacy outweighs the public’s right to know who apparently this applies to everybody in city government

    John engen boldly and ball fully took credit for creating homeword well I can tell you this homeward was not created by John anglin homeward existed in 1986

    So that you see the level of lying he will stoop to when it makes him look good but people just eat it up by the spoonful cuz the big Gerber baby smiles at em and coos. Time to stop changing the baby’s diaper and feeding him he’s grown into adulthood now he can walk on his own and get a job live off what he’s ripped off from the citizens of Missoula through LLC partnerships and perpetuities

    Nobody in Missoula valley can make these assholes accountable do they have free reign to Rico violate people’s lives

  2. Pingback: Institutional Panhandling While Real Estate Purchasing And Grant Gobbling | Zoom Chron Blog

Leave a Reply