by Travis Mateer
I listened to a podcast recently that blew my mind. It’s an interview with John Ziegler, an investigative journalist who has essentially proven that the convicted serial pedophile, Jerry Sandusky, is NOT guilty of the crimes he is currently in prison for.
How can that be? Listen to the interview.
I offer this today because I don’t have time for a proper post, and I think this story has relevance for anyone interested in narrative control.
I thank you, Mr. Mateer/Skink, for bringing this information my way. Mr. Zeigler is something we rarely see anymore (maybe rarely before either, as we glamorize the past). He is an investigative journalist and a good man. He did not set out to exonerate Jerry Sandusky. That is where the evidence took him. I spent my weekend immersed in his work, and came away refreshed, not only that Zeigler is a man of substance, but also that Sandusky is not a monster, far from it. He is a victim, and not the only one in the Penn State affair, just the one who suffered the most. We are in a Rocky Mountain snow storm here today, so nowhere to go. I will spend my morning writing about this amazing confluence of two rivers, of good and evil, with the latter of course prevailing, as that is life. Jerry Sandsuky will die in prison. Joe Biden is president. Two men, one essentially good and naive, the other evil and lacking balls, one is hailed as some kind of leader and example, the other rots in prison.
I was blown away that the evidence for Sandusky’s innocence was so strong, while at the same time the narrative control for the general public is virtually hermetically sealed from critical inquiry.
The evidence that there is a virus, SARS-CoV-2, that it has been isolated with its genome now made available for research, and that it causes disease and that people are dying from it … does not exist. “… the narrative control for the general public is virtually hermetically sealed from critical inquiry.” That’s just how we live.