If Trump Supports Reopening Schools, Does That Mean The Resistance Must Oppose It?

by William Skink

There is an unspoken rule that if Trump supports something, then it must be bad. This perspective doesn’t care about logic or evidence. Trump is such an obvious, orange-skinned menace that if he supports something, the reactionary resistance must oppose it.

Getting school-age kids back into school, like everything else about this pandemic, has become a partisan issue, with Trump coming down on the side of reopening. For parents like me who see the dire need for their kids to be back among their peers, and who see the risk of transmission as being fairly minimal, the hope that my kids could get a small modicum of normalcy by returning to school next month is disappearing with every article like this (from Politico):

President Donald Trump has been on a rampage against public schools and colleges all week, threatening to use the power of the federal government to strong-arm officials into reopening classrooms.

But his effort is now creating a backlash: An overwhelming alignment of state and even Republican-aligned organizations oppose the rush to reopen schools. The nation’s leading pediatricians, Republican state school chiefs, Christian colleges and even the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have all challenged parts of Trump’s pressure campaign.

The politicization of this critical topic ensures logic and rational thinking won’t be widely deployed to assess the actual risk of reopening schools.

So far it looks like kids are not serious vectors in the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus:

A commentary published in the journal Pediatrics, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, concludes that children infrequently transmit Covid-19 to each other or to adults and that many schools, provided they follow appropriate social distancing guidelines and take into account rates of transmission in their community, can and should reopen in the fall.

In a French study, a boy with Covid-19 exposed over 80 classmates at three schools to the disease. None contracted it. Transmission of other respiratory diseases, including influenza transmission, was common at the schools.

In a study in New South Wales, nine infected students and nine staff across 15 schools exposed a total of 735 students and 128 staff to Covid-19. Only two secondary infections resulted, one transmitted by an adult to a child.

“The data are striking,” said Dr. Raszka. “The key takeaway is that children are not driving the pandemic. After six months, we have a wealth of accumulating data showing that children are less likely to become infected and seem less infectious; it is congregating adults who aren’t following safety protocols who are responsible for driving the upward curve.”

The health department in Missoula seems to be backing up this claim when they exempted children under the age of 12 from the mask requirement for public spaces. I don’t think the Missoula County Health Department would exempt kids if there wasn’t evidence indicating they are not transmitting the virus.

Are Democrats going to feel obligated to oppose reopening schools now that Trump has strongly come out in support of reopening? What do Democrats actually believe about the safety of kids returning to school? How do they conduct their personal lives?

To answer that last question, I was at Walmart the other day stocking up on necessities (Legos) when I noticed a masked-up state representative with three kids in tow. None of the kids looked to be over the age of 12, and that’s good because none of them were wearing masks as they ran all over the place while the Democratic politician was at self-checkout scanning her groceries.

This Democrat politician obviously doesn’t see her kids as potential vectors for transmitting the virus. If she did, then her actions could be interpreted as dangerous and/or reckless. Personally, I don’t bring my kids along with me to shop for groceries because if there is any risk, keeping them at home is an easy mitigation step to take. But if I had to take them with me, I wouldn’t feel bad about keep their faces mask-free.

Getting kids back to school is not just important for our kids and their academic/emotional development, it’s also critically important for all the struggling parents out there feeling immense anxiety about the uncertainty of reopening.

If schools don’t reopen next month, what are parents going to do for child care? If they can find child care, will they be able to afford it? How many people still out of work have school-aged kids? Are kids going to have to wear masks at school? At recess?

There are many questions with no clear answers, and every day brings scarier and scarier headlines about the resurgence of cases. As fear rises, the ability to think rationally diminishes, making us more susceptible to exploitation by the sociopaths who see this pandemic as an amazing opportunity to seize more power and wealth for themselves.

About Travis Mateer

I'm an artist and citizen journalist living and writing in Montana. You can contact me here: willskink at yahoo dot com
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to If Trump Supports Reopening Schools, Does That Mean The Resistance Must Oppose It?

  1. TC says:

    Speaking as the parent of a school aged child I have many concerns about NOT re-opening. First, and most important, my child needs peer interaction desperately. Other than a few visits with friends and cousins, it has been 4+ months of a single child sequestered w/ adults. We have had at least 2 camps and 1 sport cancelled that would have provided relief. Things are starting loosen but there is a lot of emotional/social interaction behavior that needs to be re-established. Not sure how my child will fair with more remote learning – especially because the quality varies so much depending on school/teacher.
    I do find it confusing that we couldn’t have school but daycares (similar settings but with less benefit) were approved and “safe”
    Finally, just my opinion, if we can “safely” have protests, open bars and taprooms and are contemplating Griz Football attendance we sure as hell can send kids back to school!!!

    • I snapped at someone on Twitter who DOES NOT have kids because she couldn’t understand how we could be contemplating sending them back to school when it was so clear (to her) that it wasn’t safe. I said if you don’t have kids then you have no clue what parents have been going through, and what we have already seen as negative impacts to their emotional/mental health.

      if partisan bullshit takes over this topic, we need to be prepared. I’m starting to float contingency ideas to other parents I know.

  2. TC says:

    I support your efforts completely! Please keep us posted as I have a feeling Missoula County Health will once again flaunt their authority despite the opinions of the community at large

  3. TC says:

    I’m asking you for insight. I’ve been watching your blog for years. Seems like if it is a local issue that you and I are left to interact. If it is more Global (Clinton, Bush, Obama, Epstein, Pelosi) your readers will argue (10-15 comments). Why?
    Are they trolling this site? Do they really give 1/2 a shit about our community (where we all live). Are they plants?
    I always find it interesting that your Local Issues get 1 response (mine). But if you blog about Aliens building the pyramids you will get 27 responses.
    Maybe thats what is wrong with America – we always think bigger but forget the small (local)
    Something for your thoughts

    • john mcnaught says:

      I think we should follow the medical advice in a nonpartisan way. If the consensus is it can be done safely then open. If not safely then try to explore alternatives that can bring kids together in a social setting. ie swimming or biking, hiking. I missed my noon rubiks classes this spring. It was very rewarding. There was always some child coughing on me.
      Now, no way I am vulnerable.
      I lived in Missoula years ago. Northside, Stoddard if I remember. Anyway, north side. That grade school over the Scott street bridge is where my daughter attended. This blog is most valuable when the subject is Missoula. Keep up the good work.

    • I don’t think it’s trolling, it’s just easier to have an opinion on the bigger topics than the more detailed local issues I write about. and the bigger topics can be more controversial, which seems to generate more commentary.

Leave a Reply