Do Democrats Care There’s No There There?

by William Skink

I don’t think Democrats can stop themselves from imploding over Russia-gate. It doesn’t matter that according to a recent Gallup poll, less than 1% percent think it’s the most important issue facing America. Despite the unenthusiastic perception of the general public, the obsessive focus by the resistance on RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA continues to be a useful tool capable of multiple functions, like a political Swiss Army knife.

The first function was to shift attention away from the exposure of DNC corruption and HRC’s uniquely awful candidacy. A similar function has been to distract from the growing evidence of political bias within the FBI/DOJ. If you are not concerned that Strzok himself declared there’s no there there, then your hatred of Trump has impaired your ability to think objectively about the serious ramifications for what this admission means, especially after Lisa Page allegedly confirmed Strzok was indeed referring to the Russian investigation.

The gift of Russia-gate for Democrats also allowed spurious attacks on Jill Stein, tainting the despised Green Party in the process. Montana Democrats should appreciate that.

Also ignored thanks to Russia-gate is any serious focus on domestic voter purges, vulnerable voting machine software and gerrymandering. And let’s not forget that brazen smear of alternative media facilitated by the Bezos Post. Matt Taibbi did a great take down of the effort at the time for Rolling Stone.

Even local media upstart Missoula Current is getting in on the Russophobic bandwagon by running an absurdly hysterical op-ed recently by some former Marine by the name of Jon-Claud Nix. After stating (without evidence, as usual) that VLADAMIR PUTIN DID THIS (meddled in the US election), this former Marine says:

Americans of honest faith should no longer judge Trump based on the results of Mueller’s probe of election collusion; they must recognize that right now their president, the most powerful person in world governance, openly works for Russia’s interests and against America. (We’ll leave aside the completely baffling question of, “Why??”)

This is what collusion looks like in real time.

To many of us who care deeply for and even served our country against foreign enemies, Trump publicly siding with Putin is treasonous. Continuing to criticize allies while mimicking the talking points of an autocratic, lying, former KGB, Russian dictator are the words and deeds of someone who is a traitor to his country.

I find it quite interesting that this Jon-Claud dude is downplaying Mueller’s investigation. Could this be a result of a growing awareness that the bigger story is how Team Obama exploited opposition research to direct the vast powers of the surveillance state to spy on their political opponent? And still haven’t come up with convincing evidence of collusion?

No, that narrative can’t be acknowledged by the resistance. Instead we get condescending shit like this:

This doesn’t matter much as it pertains to Trump himself: True Believers in the Dear Leader will never see the truth, no matter how often or comprehensively it is pointed out. Montana Trump supporters are all-in, psychologically and politically. The Great Falls rally two weeks ago settled this point. They deserve a marginal amount of sympathy: it must be crushingly difficult to recognize that you were duped by a con-man and voted for someone who never cared about your interests.

What matters now is that Greg Gianforte and Steve Daines (the latter is not on the November ballot) either declare that they are for America and not Trump-and-Russia or get replaced.

This highlights anther use of Russia-gate: deploy against Republican politicians in a manner that calls into question their patriotism. McCarthy would be proud.

As an added bonus, Russia-gate could also help establishment Democrats fend off the progressive insurgency threatening to inch their center-right positions to the left.

For more on that front I suggest reading this MoA post, titled ‘Progressives Are Putin Stooges’ – How Centrist Democrats Help To Reelect Trump. I found this perspective from Doug Henwood (referenced in the post) to be worth highlighting:

It seems that Democrats are now incapable of talking about anything but Russian interference in our sacred elections.

The Trump administration is eviscerating environmental regulations, appointing horrific judges, prosecuting a grotesque war on refugees and immigrants, and we’re hearing about little other than Putin’s alleged hold over Trump, often expressed in grossly homophobic terms.

In doing so, they’re accepting uncritically the version of events proffered by cops, prosecutors and the CIA, organizations made up of professional liars who’ve been enemies of democracy and free expression at home and abroad for decades.

We’re seeing Dem pundits even accusing Bernie Sanders and other insurgents within their party of being Russian agents, witting or unwitting. Their indictments of Trump for treason make them sound like demented right-wingers at the height of the Cold War.

This obsession does relieve mainstream Democrats of concocting an attractive agenda that might win an election or two, but to do that they’d have to tack left, and Goldman Sachs wouldn’t like that.

This Russia obsession’s a win win for the establishment though – subdue Trump and the domestic left insurgency all at once.

I understand why those within a half a standard deviation of the center would embrace it, but why anyone further left would play along with it is beyond me.

Please stop.

Sorry Doug, they’re not going to stop. Why? Because Russia-gate is the gift that keeps on giving.

That is, until it doesn’t.

About Travis Mateer

I'm an artist and citizen journalist living and writing in Montana. You can contact me here: willskink at yahoo dot com
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Do Democrats Care There’s No There There?

  1. Turner says:

    Leaving aside the alleged Trump-Russia connection (about which I suspect there is a there there — Mueller has been mum so far), you acknowledge some bad policies Trump is pursuing. Would you vote for him in 2020 because you think he’s been treated unfairly by the Deep State?

    • I did not and will not vote for Trump. would you vote for a warmongering Democrat more likely to risk a hot war with a nuclear armed country just because you believe professional liars like Brennan that Trump is a traitor to America?

      • Big Swede says:

        Would you vote for candidate who’d support open borders and the elimination of ICE?

      • Turner says:

        “Traitor to America” is only part of it. Trump has no loyalty to his wife (or wives), his country, our allies, his close associates like Cohen, or businesses he contracts with ( he stiffs them). A narcissist, his only loyalty is to himself. He’s clever enough to use white racism to gin up and control his followers, knowing that this racism has deep roots in America.

        • Trump is the president this country deserves. I think any sense of loyalty to the American project died when Dulles and his cronies decided to assassinate JFK.

  2. Big Swede says:

    Never let the facts get in the way.

  3. Eric says:

    You guys are letting your Trump hatred cloud your vision.

    It very apparent that the Donald knows what he is doing.

    Obama never got the economy going in 8 years. He told us 3% GDP was impossible. He told us manufacturing jobs were gone forever. He was historical, the first black President, yet black unemployment soared. He didn’t have any better luck with rogue leaders that GW or Clinton did.

    So you say you won’t vote for Trump in 2020, yet he has done so much good for America.

    Do you hate America too?

    • Turner says:

      I’m not a great fan of Obama, but what you’re saying is just countrerfactual bullshit.

      • Eric says:

        No Turner – turning around the economy is not BS.

        Fixing foreign policy isn’t BS.

        Having Gorsuch on the SCOTUS and Kavanaugh next isn’t BS.

        Securing our borders isn’t BS.

        Record low unemployment, especially among minorities isn’t BS.

        BUT – hating President Trump, because it’s fashionable, that IS BS.

        • Turner says:

          “Fixing foreign policy”? “Turning around the economy”? These are Fox News lies not facts. Repeating them mindlessly does not make them true. The economy was already roaring when Trump entered office and a Republican tax giveaway to millionaires gave the stock market a temporary boost while screwing millions of non-millionaires. His foreign policy has amounted to sucking up to dictators while starting unnecessary and costly fights with allies. What kind of fix is that.

  4. Eric says:

    Good luck with revising history Turner, especially when the economic indicators are too new to revise!

    Unemployment, especially Minority unemployment – all time record lows.

    People getting back into the workforce.

    GDP over 4%

    Wages climbing, State revenues rebounding, consumer spending on the rise.

    North Korea tearing down its missile test site. Returning remains of US Soldiers, cooperating with Washington.

    China is no acting the aggressor with their military. The rest of the worlds disctators have their hat in their hand now, realizing that The Donald isn’t a pussy like Obama is/was.

    Do you really think you can convince people they are worse off now? Let us know how that works out for you!

    • I think one of Trump’s biggest mistakes was trying to own the top of the market because it will mean he will own the collapse when it happens. Eric, you are being conned exactly like liberals were conned by Obama.

  5. Eric says:

    If that’s the case, it’s a very good con job, putting money in my pocket and expecting nothing but hard work.

Leave a Reply