Gentrify This

by William Skink

I’ve been watching Orange is the New Black and a recent episode told the backstory of “Lolly”, a mentally ill inmate. After losing her job and becoming homeless, Lolly finds a little niche for herself, sleeping in a car and delivering coffee to people in the neighborhood. Then she sees the sign of an impending condo project which gentrifies the area she calls home, ultimately pushing her into an interaction with law enforcement that lands her in prison.

Though fiction, this story is rooted in very real trends. Yesterday Counterpunch had an article by Ron Jacobs, titled Gentrify It All! The article is about gentrification in Burlington, Vermont, but it could easily be about Missoula.  From the link:

Neoliberal capitalism is universal in its domination, if nothing else. From the fast-growing tent cities in Portland, Oregon to the hideaway camps in Burlington, Vermont; from the men living in boxes in Baltimore to the folks living next to garbage dumps in Manila, the results of property speculation motivated by a neoliberal dream of easy wealth are everywhere. One can go to any city in the capitalist world and see some edifice being built where there were once homes or small shops. After a little bit of research, one will usually discover this construction is some kind of so-called public-private venture which in reality will benefit the private investors in the equation considerably more than the public side. Indeed, the likely results for the public will be higher housing costs, less public space and more police (private and public) whose job is to regulate the public’s use of the private space.

This is the scenario currently playing out in the downtown area of Vermont’s largest city, Burlington. Although small in size when compared with the megalopolises of the world’s great cities, Burlington serves as the largest urban area in the mostly rural state. Its downtown has long been one of those public spaces where certain streets are actually privately managed, except for the policing. Rules for public speaking, tabling, busking and other activities are made by a management corporation that coordinates with the city administration on legal issues and enforcement. The arrangement represents a compromise reached between advocates for open public space and those who see the primary purpose of the downtown as one of generating profits for the businesses located there. Over the years, this has fomented debates about young people hanging out downtown, transients panhandling, musicians busking, and citizens engaging in grassroots political activity. In recent years, this has resulted in more restrictions on many of these activities, despite performances and protests opposing those restrictions.

Sound familiar? This is precisely why the Missoula Redevelopment Agency exists, to sweeten the pot for private investors who are looking for a return on their investment. That return isn’t in the form of some non-quantifiable public good, nope, it’s monetary return they are looking for, so unless you’re spending money in the newly revitalized space, your presence isn’t welcome. Here’s more from the article:

I mention this history to introduce the current battle being fought over this part of Burlington. In short, the pro-developer mayor, with most (if not all) of the City Council in his pocket, is attempting to foist a multimillion dollar bond on the city’s residents that would help a private developer renovate a shopping mall in the heart of downtown. This project would further limit public use of the downtown area by non-shoppers, enlarging the commercial space and creating condos unaffordable to most working people. The development corporation hoping to do this renovation, Devonwood Corporation, is represented in the Burlington venture by Donald Sinex, its founder and partner since 1997 (Bloomberg.com). Neither Sinex nor his corporation undertakes projects for the public interest. This project is an investment. Like any capitalist entity, Devonwood exists to make a profit. Of course, this does not mean it is against using public funds to make that profit. According to the developer and citizen’s committee formed to challenge this development project, the Coalition for a Livable City, the mechanism Devonwood hopes to use to get the public monies is called a TIF, which is an acronym for Tax Incremental Financing.

TIF funding is a favorite funding mechanism in Missoula as well. Here is an op-ed from the MRA board from a few years ago lauding TIF financing:

Tax increment financing is one of the best economic development tools available to Montana communities. The process of collecting TIF funds begins when a local government uses a public process to study a specific area to determine if it is in need of redevelopment. If the city council finds that the area is suited for redevelopment and designates it as an “urban renewal district,” the Montana Department of Revenue establishes a base value for the district. Then, for the limited life of the district, any taxes collected that exceed those of the base value of the district are TIF funds that are used for public purposes within the district. Missoula’s TIF program is administered by a small staff and a five-member volunteer board appointed by the mayor and approved by the City Council.

The City Council created the Missoula Redevelopment Agency and the first urban renewal district in 1978. That first district encompassed the core of the downtown, which had been ravaged by businesses moving away from the historic center of town. That district existed until 2005, and the cooperative effort to redevelop it was, by any measure, a resounding success. Between 1978 and 2005, more than $20 million of new public revenue — all of which was generated by the redevelopment of properties within the district — was reinvested in the downtown. These funds were used to build one of the best trail systems in the Northwest, riverfront parks, improved drainage, alleys, sidewalks, streets, upgraded utilities and improved fire protection. That $20 million investment of public dollars leveraged more than $200 million in other funding, much of which came from private development, and all of which was used to improve the downtown. The result is that Missoula has one of the most vibrant and successful downtowns in the region.

So downtown was “ravaged by businesses moving away” and the miracle of TIF funding over the decades has revitalized downtown, creating a vibrant economic center. But where were those businesses moving to decades ago? The Southgate mall? If so, that is not the case anymore. Malls are now in decline as urban center revive, so how about TIF money for the Lambros family so they don’t have to suffer the economic trend de-emphasizing walking malls. MRA to the rescue!

The Missoula Redevelopment Agency has approved nearly $7 million in Tax Increment Financing for Southgate Mall area development which will be used to help build a new movie theater and a road that will connect Brooks and Reserve streets through the mall parking lot.

This first phase of three will include demolition of existing buildings, construction of a state of the art theater and retail building, initial construction of vehicle and walking trails, and parking lot upgrades.

The public funds will will account for about 10% of the total cost of the first phase with the other $64 million coming from private investments.

Missoula Mayor John Engen urged the agency before the decision council to approve the funds, calling it an opportunity to do something that has never been done before in Missoula.

“So this first phase, I think, is relatively inexpensive,” Engen said. “I think what it does is meets a number of public needs, not the least of which is to get from Brooks Street to Reserve Street.”

It must be nice for wealthy developers to get public money to get better road access and a movie theater Missoula doesn’t need.

Mayor Engen has tapped MRA to be a crucial part of his new housing initiative because Engen claims he doesn’t want Missoula to become Boulder, Colorado, but I think it’s projects like this stupid mall theater and the monstrosity being proposed for the Riverfront Triangle that indicates what the Mayor’s priorities for Missoula actually are, and it’s not affordable housing.

The problem I see with all this development is this: in order for businesses to flourish they need customers, and in order to buy shit, customers need money in their pockets. Well, guess what, after the dynamics of neoliberalism hollowed out the manufacturing base of this country, replacing good-paying jobs with bartenders and baristas, the purchasing power of consumers (consumerism accounting for nearly 3/4 of America’s GDP) has been greatly diminished.

Desperate to preserve and expand the tax base, development in Missoula will continue going full steam ahead until the next economic cataclysm descends, which is just around the corner. When that happens we will see if there is any public benefit from the public investment we’ve been sold.

Hiding in Plain Sight: John-Mark

By JC

Having been intrigued by another blogger’s new found life’s calling examining the seeming early deaths of so many of our “talented” comedians, musicians, actors and politicians, I thought I’d try my hand at the craft. But never did I think I’d come across this: said blogger has all along been nothing more than a “deceased” comedic actor hiding in plain site! Yes, you heard that right. Mark Tokarski is John Candy!

John Candy died a very mysterious death in Durango, Mexico. While he was working on the movie Wagons West! it was reported that he died of an apparent heart attack. Adding to the mystery was the fact that right before he died he sold his interest in the Toronto Argonauts, worth millions. So he had plenty of money with which to assume a new identity and leave his life as a failing actor before he became a footnote in the annals of Hollywood.

An official autopsy was never performed, and circumstances were setup to implicate that John had a heart attack. But it seems that he tipped off some people that he was going to disappear in Mexico, and his “funeral” was attended by many of his comedian friends, and Dan Akroyd — his business partner — gave the eulogy. No doubt Dan and John Candy’s other friends had the last laugh at a private get together after the sham funeral. And John Candy would be 65 this year, apparently about the same age as Mark!

Using the incredible techniques developed by Mark Tokarski at Pieceofmindful.com, I discovered that John Candy and Mark bear an incredible likeness. I adjusted the pictures so that the pupils were equidistant, and superimposed on the other, and just as Mark has said, facial features lining up are a unique event — one in millions. Well, obviously John Candy died and replaced Mark Tokarski in 1994. What happened to the original Mark is not known at this time, but I will keep investigating to see where he turned up. Maybe he has a twin brother somewhere that had an identity to assume. Maybe the mob that John was associated with (we know all actors who own bars in Chicago are mob-related!) took Mark out and threatened his family so they would keep it hush.

So here is the evidence that I present to you, the first picture being the two images I assembled from Mark’s Linkedin public profile, and the other from a John Candy fan site.

John-Mark

And here is the composite image of the two, with John Candy overlaid on the left. Look at the remarkable match — the bags under the eyes, the dimples and chipped teeth, the double chin! Apparently John was able to lose much of the weight he put on while under the stress of being an actor and of all his other business interests, after assuming Mark’s identity. Everybody knows how hard it is for an actor to deal with stress, and John did it by eating. Mark’s nose has been surgically altered to give it a little bit of a hook, but that was done so that it wasn’t quickly apparent to the average shmuck that they were being duped. The crook in the nose remained the same after reconstructive plastic surgery. Everything else lines up perfectly — ear lobes, eyebrows, lips, receding hair line!

Amazing what one can do with an expert application of Photoshop like Mark has taught us how to do! And I find it fascinating that the match between the two in these photos is even better than any of the photo pairs that Mark has assembled. What an awesome way to discover the true reality of the lifestyles of the rich and famous!

I give you John-Mark:

john-mark2

Apologies to the family, friends and fans of John Candy for this piece of sarcasm.

 

Hillary Escapes Indictment!

by William Skink

It’s time to pop the corks, Democrats! Forget the micro-aggression of that phallic-shaped bottle for just a second and enjoy the ultimate victory of identity politics: Hillary Clinton (and her vagina) now have an unencumbered path to the White House, thanks to James Comey’s statement today that the FBI will not be bringing charges against Hillary Clinton (and her vagina):

In a surprising statement which concluded moments ago, FBI directos James Comey announced that Federal officials have decided not to pursue federal charges against Hillary Clinton for her private email setup, an announcement that will send a shockwave throughout national politics.

In a press briefing at the bureau’s headquarters in downtown Washington, Comey said investigators and prosecutors had concluded there was not sufficient evidence to push forward with an indictment against Clinton, clearing her of a federal investigation that has loomed over her presidential campaign for nearly a year. Comey’s announcement comes just three days after the former secretary of State sat for a 3.5-hour interview with the FBI on Saturday, and just a few hours before President Obama is set to campaign with Clinton in Charlotte, N.C.

What is shocking is that Comey admitted that Clinton used not one but several different email servers, adding that 110 emails contained classified information and 8 contained top secret information, he also reported that Clinton did not turn over “several thousand” emails to the FBI and added that due to Hillary’s sloppy set up, it is possible that “hostile actors” got access to Clinton’s emails.

Yet, despite all these facts, the FBI has decided not to proceed with recommending charges.

It must be nice to live in a world where one is immune to the consequences of criminal behavior. There are literally thousands of people stuck in jail every day in this land of the free because they can’t afford to pay fines for petty ordinance violations, but Hillary Clinton can lie to Federal investigators, destroy evidence and run the State Department like a fucking fundraising arm of her sleazy foundation, and nope, the FBI and DOJ aren’t going to do a goddamn thing about it.

The reign of the Queen of Chaos approaches. The odious Trump will scare the lemmings to leap from the left side of the cliff instead of the right, but the result will be the same: obliteration by the rising fascist tide engulfing America, condemning us to more war and economic misery.

Happy Wee Hours on the 3rd of July

by William Skink

I know we like to blow shit up in America. I’m still awake because someone just can’t help themselves at 12:30am, two days before the 4th of July. Hey, we’re out in the county now, so I guess I’ll just have to deal with it.

One way I could respond to ordinances exploding down the street at 12:30am is to escalate the situation. I could buy louder fireworks up on the rez tomorrow and blow them up in the vicinity of this asshole’s domicile, but way later, like 3am. But I won’t do that, because I’ve read Dr. Seuss, and I know how The Butter Battle Book turns out.

If Hillary Clinton sat down and read The Butter Battle Book, her reaction is now easy to assume: we Yooks should have kept the Zooks from getting a Big-Boy Boomeroo in the first place, by any means necessary.

Why do I say *now* it’s easy to assume? Has their been some kind of insight into the rationale of destroying another Mideast country (Syria) that is different from the humanitarian interventionist bullshit this Strangelovian warbeast has shoveled onto her clueless cult followers? Why yes, yes there has been, and if it was reported on cable news with the proper context, it could be scandalous enough to end her run at the White House.

Here is the take from Robert Parry, most certainly not cable news, framing a most revealing email:

Publicly, Hillary Clinton has toyed with both the democracy and humanitarian arguments but one of her official emails – released by the State Department – explains that the underlying reason for the Syrian “regime change” war was the Israeli government’s desire to remove Syria as the link in the supply chain between Iran and Israel’s foe, Lebanon’s Hezbollah.

Though undated and unsigned, the Clinton email reflected the then-Secretary of State’s thinking as of late April 2012 (when it appears to have been sent), about one year into the Syrian civil war. The email explains the need for “regime change” in Damascus as important to Israel, which wanted to blunt Iranian regional influence and protect Israel’s “nuclear monopoly,” which is acknowledged quite frankly although Israel’s status as a rogue nuclear state is still considered a state secret by the U.S. government.

“The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad,” Clinton’s email states, brushing aside President Obama’s (eventually successful) negotiations to restrict Iran’s nuclear program.

“Negotiations to limit Iran’s nuclear program will not solve Israel’s security dilemma,” the Clinton email says. “Nor will they stop Iran from improving the crucial part of any nuclear weapons program — the capability to enrich uranium. At best, the talks between the world’s major powers and Iran that began in Istanbul this April and will continue in Baghdad in May will enable Israel to postpone by a few months a decision whether to launch an attack on Iran that could provoke a major Mideast war.”

The email explains: “Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. For Israeli leaders, the real threat from a nuclear-armed Iran is not the prospect of an insane Iranian leader launching an unprovoked Iranian nuclear attack on Israel that would lead to the annihilation of both countries. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly. …

Get that? Hillary wants to make sure the Yooks can maintain their armageddon leverage, because that way, the Yooks can use lesser ordinances, like their gadzook cluster bombs, to ensure that anyone who enjoys their bread with the butter side down remembers not to get too uppity.

So if that was Hillary circa April, 2012, what the hell is Hillary post-FBI interview 2016 gonna do to keep her path to the White House clear of pesky hindrances, like felonies and hubbies cornering Lorettas on the tarmac?

That interview, which happened today with a gaggle of lawyers (probably not the correct plural term), has been perfectly timed for the fuck-yeah culmination of summertime exuberance this weekend, celebrating the myth of American Independence.

Yes, myth, because there are no words, founding documents, or laws that really mean anything anymore.

What there is is dependence, dependence on grocery stores, government-funded (therefore decaying) infrastructure, cheap labor and an ocean of red ink that will be extracted somehow, in some form, but surely not from the ones who sit on top the great vampire squid Matt Taibbi described (and quietly suckles from).

And the ultimate dependence, the “representative government” we pretend is democratically elected, with an executive branch functionary a finger away from the button to start WWIII.

For those bummed out the Southgate Mall won’t be dazzling our Big Sky with their annual fireworks show, just wait. When The Donald is defeated, and Hillary ascends, the final show will be breathtaking.