What Hides Beneath the Surface?

by William Skink

I’ve been having some fun playing around with the photo apps I got recently. There is some intention, though, to the images I’m assembling and will continue to share.

The scene above is set in Missoula; the up and coming Sawmill District, to be specific. (part of that half billion dollars in development that’s going to be happening in Missoula in the next decade). Not only were these big, rusted pieces of industrial machinery visually intriguing, but upon closer inspection I discovered they were providing temporary shelter for people. I found clothes, blankets, a makeshift latrine and lots of empty cans of malt liquor strewn about.

Obama’s smiling image, hovering over this abandoned machinery, has a crack and is starting to melt, which I think is quite appropriate. We are coming to the end of Obama’s disastrous tenure at the helm of the Titanic, and the economic situation that he will pass on to the next figurehead is a ticking time bomb, as evidenced by an alarming letter the Fed recently sent to JP Morgan:

Yesterday the Federal Reserve released a 19-page letter that it and the FDIC had issued to Jamie Dimon, the Chairman and CEO of JPMorgan Chase, on April 12 as a result of its failure to present a credible plan for winding itself down if the bank failed. The letter carried frightening passages and large blocks of redacted material in critical areas, instilling in any careful reader a sense of panic about the U.S. financial system.

A rational observer of Wall Street’s serial hubris might have expected some key segments of this letter to make it into the business press. A mere eight years ago the United States experienced a complete meltdown of its financial system, leading to the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression. President Obama and regulators have been assuring us over these intervening eight years that things are under control as a result of the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation. But according to the letter the Fed and FDIC issued on April 12 to JPMorgan Chase, the country’s largest bank with over $2 trillion in assets and $51 trillion in notional amounts of derivatives, things are decidedly not under control.

If that wasn’t bad enough, our pals the terrorist-loving Saudis recently threatened to dump their Treasury holdings if our government lets the terrorist cat out of the bag that Saudi Arabia helped finance the 9/11 attack:

In a stunning report by the NYT, Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration and members of Congress that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Or mostly Congress, because Obama has remained steadfast in his support of his Wahhabi petrodollar overlords, and has been busy lobbying Congress to block the bill’s passage, according to administration officials and congressional aides from both parties, and the Saudi threats have been the subject of intense discussions in recent weeks between lawmakers and officials from the State Department and the Pentagon. The officials have warned senators of diplomatic and economic fallout from the legislation.

Yep, I think Wahhabi petrodollar overlords is a good description of this berserker nation wreaking havoc from Yemen to Syria to North Dakota, where the collapse of oil prices has destroyed the fracking boom. Too bad America is too indebted to not take this threat seriously.

The economy is a house of cards built on debt and deceit, but that won’t stop local development from keeping the gentrification train chugging along. Another downtown condo-project was recently announced in the Missoulian (sorry, no link), this one a 27-unit, 4-story building where the defunct Firestone shop on Main Street currently sits because that is precisely what Missoula needs, more high-end condos that your average Missoulian can’t afford.

The economic situation is why the Bern insurgency continues to threaten the coronation of Hillary Clinton. I hope those in the “progressive” Montana blogosphere will become more vocal as Montana’s June primary vote approaches. Right now what’s out there is pathetic.

Ode to Osama

O fortuitous prince of jihad
to you we raise our vessels
assured the alchemy of blood to gold
will
transmogrify for generations to come

there’s no profits without
a prophet of death like you
to prime the pump for our taking

sure, we spawn others
like ISIS and al-Nusra, but
please know in the space where
most people have hearts
we have a special place carved
like initials
on the cold, dark center of our being

a center that will hold (we lied
to Yeats) while everything else

blows away

William Skink

Evan Barrett Lays Stinking Pile in Billings Gazette

by William Skink

 

–Hillary Clinton Superdelegate

Evan Barrett has an opinion piece in the Billings Gazette where he tries to explain how Montana Democrats prevent delegate fights in Montana. While I assumed this has been accomplished through Montana Democrats selling their delegates to Hillary for $64,100 dollars, Barrett has a different take. Readers can decided how full of shit he is. From the first link:

While it took about five years to implement, the first big change to improve that system created something called “proportional representation.” Simplistically stated, if a candidate had 60 percent of the votes in a county committee, he/she would get 60 percent of the county’s delegates to the state convention. And the proportional support for that candidate at the state convention would be reflected in the percentage of the delegation to the national convention who supported that candidate. That change brought a lot more fairness to our process as compared to the old winner-take-all system.

But the numbers still reflected an insiders political game. So, in 1974, Pat Williams and I drafted a bill to re-create a Montana presidential primary so that the base of the presidential delegate selection process could reflect the preference vote of all Montana Democrats. Pat was not yet a Congressman but was extremely knowledgeable about the issue.

After moving from a winner-take-all primary to proportional results based on voting percentages, Barrett states that he and Pat Williams weren’t yet done improving the Democratic primary process. What they accomplished, Barrett claims, is a reduction in the intra-fighting between Democrats in America:

The way we Montana Democrats use the presidential primary, when combined with proportional representation, has minimized intra-party conflict. Under Montana Democratic Party rules, the votes of the electorate for each candidate in the presidential primary are reflected upward through the entire delegate selection process. The number of delegates each presidential candidate gets to have from Montana at the Democratic National Convention is proportionally “baked into the cake” as a result of the primary vote here. There are no longer any fights between the supporters of presidential candidates over the number of delegates they will have. If there is any fighting it is within the supporter groups of each candidate over who which supporter might get to go to the national convention, given the limited number of seats allocated.

This intra-group fighting is much less damaging than the inter-group fighting that used to occur before proportional representation and the presidential primary were in place.

So, as the race between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders intensifies, the Democratic Party rules here in Montana have significantly reduced the rancor and increased the accuracy of reflecting what the grassroots Democrat wants.

Bullshit? Sounds like it to me. Let’s recap what is going down this year in Montana with Democrats, according to Margot Kidder:

Our state party leadership signed a deal with a woman who out here, on our turf, possibly wouldn’t last a week. They signed away our unobstructed right to choose which Democratic candidate we supported for President. Given that we have 15 pledged delegates and seven Super Delegates, we have lost our absolute right to have Super Delegate endorsements proportional to the wishes of the primary voters

For what? Sixty four thousand and one hundred dollars? Which we had to give back? That’s a pretty poor excuse for selling out our right to our own choice.

So which assessment of Montana’s Democratic primary process is more accurate, Barrett’s or Kidder’s?

Lesser Evil: A Poem For Hillary Clinton

LESSER EVIL

Hillary has some problems
with money from The Man
and all across the world
blood dripping from her hands

from killings in Honduras
after the government fell
to chaos unleashed in Libya
opening the gates of hell

Hillary has some problems
but a conscience isn’t one
she cackled when Gaddafi
was sodomized with a gun

private email server?
fuck your puny laws
the Queen of Chaos ascends
to the realm of evil gods

so bow before your leader
as the devil smiles with glee
it truly is astounding
Americans think they’re free

you’re free to choose the evil
Kissinger admires
like a torture victim choosing
between a blowtorch or pliers

unhappy with your choice?
ok, well, tough shit
you want a woman in the White House
Hillary Clinton is it

William Skink