Month: November 2017

by William Skink

America’s worst mass-shooting is getting virtually no media attention a little over a month since one guy allegedly slaughtered 58 people for no good reason. Doesn’t anyone find this odd?

Lack of motive is just one glaring problem with what happened in Las Vegas. The witness, Jesus Campos, disappeared right before his first media appearance and didn’t reappear until days later when he suddenly gave his first and only interview to Ellen Degeneres. Doesn’t anyone find this odd?

Changing timelines, multiple witness accounts of multiple shooters and no images of the alleged lone wolf in one of the most heavily surveilled environments on earth. Doesn’t anyone find this odd?

While mainstream media moves on to the next mass shooting, conspiratorial speculation persists online. My go-to conspiracy vetting forum is Rigorous Intuition and today I ran across an inspired piece of speculation that connects some of the data points and ties it all in to the bloody royal feud that’s erupted in Saudi Arabia.

I am not familiar at all with the website this comes from–Project Avalon–but I’m going to throw it out there anyway because Saudi Arabia really is imploding right now and heading for another confrontation in a region steeped in confrontations, this time with Lebanon.

If what happened in Las Vegas was a failed assassination attempt the triggered Salman’s moves to eliminate his rivals and seize their assets, the implications would be significant.

With all that said, here’s the theory:

CREDIT TO: JoAnne Moretti – Proof Negative Radio Show: REAL Patriot News 11/6/17 (Archive Link) starts at 1hr 41 min into broadcast

Last night, I was on radio discussing the Las Vegas shooting and the connection to what is happening in Saudi Arabia.
They are connected.
I’ll start at the beginning.
There was a King Fasal who had a son, Prince Alwaleed, bin Talal.
King Fasal took ill and named his brother Salman as king in his place.
King Salman has named his son an heir to the throne, instead of his brother’s son Prince Al Waleed.
Al Waleed is a Wahabbi. Salman is Suni.
Wahabbi is extreme Islam.
Salman wanted a more modern, non extreme Islam for Saudi. That’s why he named his own son as heir.
In Las Vegas, Prince Al Waleed owned the upper floors of the Mandalay Bay resort, including the 32nd floor that was one of the points of shooting at the strip.
I say one of the places, because the witnesses were all correct. There were other locations too.
The Mandalay Bay has a heli-pad on the roof. That is important, because that was the escape route after the carnage.
Paddock was a pilot. He was also a gun runner between the Philippines and the US.
He was running guns for Prince Al Waleed.
He didn’t win at the casino. Those millions came from smuggling.
On the night of the attack, I found out that King Salman was in Las Vegas. (I didn’t know that part until after the show and I received a missing piece of info.
Salman was at the Tropicana.

Paddock was victim one.
Others were used to shoot at the country music venue.
That was to create chaos and distract from the real target over at the Tropicana.
Al Waleed’s assassins shot from Mandalay bay, but they also were at the Tropicana trying to kill Salman.
That explains why there were shooters on the ground as well as in the air.
Remember the videos of the helicopter fly over.
I asked why a helicopter would be there when there was a shooter high up.
It wasn’t news, or cops.
It was the assassins who ran up the stairs to the roof from the 32nd floor.
Remember they sealed the door to the stairwell?
Paddock had access to the service elevator, because the boss said he could use the elevator.
Nobody questioned him.
Meanwhile the assassination attempt on Salman failed.
Now we are seeing the result of the failed attempt.
It was not only an assassination attempt and a terror attack, but an attempted coup in Saudi.
This is why everyone shut up in Las Vegas.
The response is still ongoing.
You are watching it play out.
As I said, I spoke on air about this.
I will post links in comments to prove my story.
Las Vegas was definitely a terror attack.
Al Waleed, the owner of the suite was who is behind all of it.
All the witnesses citing multiple shooters all told the truth.
There were shootouts along the strip and in Mandalay Bay & Tropicana hotels.
The reason nobody is talking is it’s not over yet.

This explanation seems entirely plausible. It certainly makes more sense than what’s been offered so far.

It’s too bad we Americans have such short attention spans. Las Vegas is just another rabbit hole to be ignored until the next spectacle comes along, which of course it already has.

The next time you hear about Las Vegas it will be a story about a billion dollar security effort to install imaging devices and other security measures all down the strip and beyond.

by William Skink

Yesterday a homeless man was found unresponsive outside the Union Gospel Mission and later pronounced dead due to hypothermia. Today it was finally reported by one local media outlet, NBC Montana:

The Missoula Police Department responded to an unresponsive man at the block of 600 Owen Street at 6:25 a.m. Monday.

The coroner says Timothy Lloyd, 61, was pronounced dead at the hospital due to hypothermia.

Authorities don’t believe foul play was involved.

That’s it, just a little blurb. I can’t help but wonder what would happen if an image of his dead body appeared above the fold in the Missoulian. If one image of a dead refugee can inspire Missoula to welcome hundreds of refugees a year, maybe showing this homeless man’s frozen corpse will transform lip-service into action.

by William Skink

The Democrat machine and its many loyal foot soldiers require persistent criticism due to their persistent cluelessness about why they can’t win elections.

Thanks to Uranium deals, dossiers, and Donna Brazile, the Clinton side of the swamp is starting to get sucked into the orbit of Trump’s. Instead of a broad acknowledgment of system-wide corruption, the partisan lines seem to be holding.

There are no partisan lines when it comes to influence peddling, also known as lobbying. Along with Manafort being indicted, Tony Podesta jumped ship to prepare his legal defense against Mueller the supposed swamp monster slayer. Panic on K Street?

The indictments and who paid for Russian intel are the big headliners. And boy is Donna Brazile making a splash right now. But there are real consequences happening because camp Clinton manipulated the cash-starved Democrat machine to ensure a primary win.

One of Clinton’s most vocal Montana supporters is Carol Williams, and here is how she responded to Brazile’s claims of “rigging”:

Brazile alleges that the DNC, the Clinton campaign and Clinton’s joint fundraising committee conspired to “control the party’s finances, strategy and all the money it raised.”

But Carol Williams of Missoula, who led the state’s Clinton delegation at the national convention and is a longtime Clinton friend, said Brazile should have been aware of the party’s financial problems when she took the job from former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Williams said it was Clinton – not Sanders – who raised money to support the Democratic Party, which was broke at the time. As a result, Clinton had the right to receive the benefits of her own fundraising, Williams said.

“Sanders is no Democrat and had no interest in raising money for the Democrats, and he raised no money for the Democrats,” Williams said. “We had one candidate in this last election who cared about the party and wanted to raise money to ensure it was supported, and Clinton did. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it.”

This position is a perfect example of why so many find the Democratic party to be broken beyond repair. What Williams is saying here is basically forget the popular policy positions Sanders represents and all the people who support those positions. Sanders is “no Democrat” and doesn’t make us money, Hillary does, so fuck him.

But HOW does Hillary make the DNC money? Is it a scheme that uses State campaign laws to get around campaign donation limits, then funneling the vast majority of money back to Hillary, leaving coffers dry for State races? Why yes, Carol Williams, yes it was that kind of scheme, and that’s why the DNC tried to hide it:

Leaked emails show the Democratic National Committee scrambled this spring to conceal the details of a joint fundraising arrangement with Hillary Clinton that funneled money through state Democratic parties.

But during the three-month period when the DNC was working to spin the situation, state parties kept less than one half of one percent of the $82 million raised through the arrangement — validating concerns raised by campaign finance watchdogs, state party allies and Bernie Sanders supporters.

The arrangement, called the Hillary Victory Fund, allowed the Clinton campaign to seek contributions of hundreds of thousands of dollars to attend extravagant fundraisers including a dinner at George Clooney’s house and a concert at Radio City Music Hall featuring Katy Perry and Elton John. That’s resulted in criticism for Clinton, who has made opposition to big money in politics a key plank in her campaign platform.

Clinton’s allies have responded publicly by arguing that the fund is raising big money to boost down-ballot Democratic candidates by helping the 40 state parties that are now participating in the fund.

But privately, officials at the DNC and on Clinton’s campaign worked to parry questions raised by reporters, as well as Sanders’ since-aborted campaign, about the distribution of the money, according to a cache of hacked emails made public late last week by WikiLeaks.

And what was the result in Montana of the Democrat machine focusing on its one candidate running for President? Oh yeah, only Steve Bullock won a statewide race, and he did that just to keep his seat warm while he prepares to run for President in 2020.

It would be one thing if Democrats showed the slightest hint of being able to admit to what’s not working and make changes, but after a year of Trump I just don’t see it.

Claiming Russia was behind the email leaks, and all the anti-Russia hysteria peddled since then, has taken up a lot of oxygen, even veering toward forcing social media platforms to suppress targeted content.

And identity politics is going strong as well. A post at Logicosity takes a look at what’s being said by MDLCC, and what’s not being said:

In a fundraising plea dated August 22, 2017 that is devoted exclusively to very narrow set of social issues, Amanda Frickle, the headmistress for MDLCC, lays out the case for recipients to part with $100.00.

Message: D’s good. R’s evil. “And, one of the biggest battles we have in our hands is how to fight back against discrimination and prejudice that has no place in our communities and no place in the halls of our State Legislature.”
Duh.

No mention of the condition of the state budget and critical services for the frail and vulnerable that are on the chopping block. Not a word about the uphill battle to reauthorize expanded Medicaid, one of the few progressive legislative accomplishments in recent memory. And, the plight of workers and working families? Nowhere to be found.

Later in the post another quote from Frickle’s appeal:

“It’s about electing more Democrats who will not only not support extreme ideologies, but will fight for a statewide Non-Discrimination Ordinance, who will pen letters urging the Helena City Commission to remove a Confederate Fountain in a public place, and who will work tirelessly every day to ensure that everyone is given a fair chance.”

Do Democrats in Montana WANT to keep losing? Prioritizing identity politics issues over class issues is one of the big reasons we have President Trump.

In a state facing the very real fiscal crisis Montana is facing, please, Amanda Frickle, leave the fight over the Confederate Fountain for another day.